Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland
2. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 251 Hellenic Air Force General Hospital, Athens, Greece
3. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract
Summary
Introduction
This study investigated the effect of the timing of second molar bonding on the time required for the levelling of the mandibular dental arch.
Trial design
Single-centre two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial using random permuted blocks. Allocation concealment was achieved through sealed envelopes. There was blinding in outcome assessment, but not of patient or operator.
Methods
Thirty-six patients (12–18 years old) with mild to moderate crowding and fully erupted mandibular second molars were assigned randomly (1:1 ratio) in two groups. Group A started fixed orthodontic treatment by bracket bonding in both jaws. Initial wire was 0.014” NiTi. Lower second molar tubes were bonded at the time of 0.016” x 0.022” NiTi wire placement. Group B was same as Group A, but second lower molars were bonded at the first appointment. Placement of the 0.017” x 0.025” stainless steel wire in the mandibular arch was considered the primary endpoint of the trial, indicating the completion of the levelling phase. The days required from bonding to the endpoint comprised the main outcome. Non-parametric statistics were applied.
Results
There were two dropouts in each group. The compared groups had similar baseline characteristics regarding age, sex, overjet, overbite, space in the dental arch, average Curve of Spee (CoS), and maximum CoS. Group A tended to require more days for levelling (median: 203 days) than Group B (median: 168 days). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.128). From the tested occlusal factors, only initial overjet was found to be moderately associated with the days required to complete levelling of the mandibular arch (r = 0.45, P = 0.009).
Conclusions
In the frame of the current study, the duration of the levelling phase of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances was not affected by the timing of second molar inclusion in the appliance. Future research could aim in cases with deep CoS to generalize the present findings and in larger sample sizes.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference19 articles.
1. Oral health-related quality of life in orthodontics: a cross-sectional multicentre study on patients in orthodontic treatment;Paes da Silva;European Journal of Orthodontics,,2020
2. Factors associated with patient and parent satisfaction after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review;Pachêco-Pereira;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,,2015
3. The orthodontic-periodontic interrelationship in integrated treatment challenges: a systematic review;Gkantidis;Journal of Oral Rehabilitation,,2010
4. Apical root resorption due to mandibular first molar mesialization: a split-mouth study;Winkler;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,,2017
5. Effectiveness of non-conventional methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Gkantidis;Journal of Dentistry,,2014
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献