Understanding rapid infant weight gain prevention: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence

Author:

Rotevatn Torill A1ORCID,Melendez-Torres G J2,Overgaard Charlotte1,Peven Kimberly3,Hyldgaard Nilsen Jane14,Bøggild Henrik15,Høstgaard Anna Marie Balling1

Affiliation:

1. Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

2. DECIPHer, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK

3. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK

4. Department of Midwifery, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark

5. Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background Rapid infant weight gain (RIWG) is strongly related to childhood overweight and obesity, and prevention of RIWG is an approach to early years obesity prevention. This systematic review aimed to explore effectiveness, deliverers’ and recipients’ experiences of involvement, and key intervention components and processes of such prevention activities. Methods Key databases and websites were searched systematically for quantitative and qualitative studies covering intervention effectiveness, experiences with intervention involvement or process outcomes. After duplicate screening and quality assessment, papers were analyzed through narrative synthesis, thematic synthesis and intervention component analysis. Results Seven quantitative and seven qualitative studies were eligible for inclusion. Most intervention studies reported small, but significant results on infant weight gain. More significant results were measured on weight gain during the first compared with the second year of life. A weak evidence base made elaboration of the relationship between intervention effectiveness and content challenging. Home-delivered interventions may be more relevant for parents. Contextual factors, such as social norms, beliefs and professional identity should be considered during intervention development. Stakeholder involvement can be key to increase intervention acceptability and feasibility. Conclusions The field of RIWG prevention is new and evolving, but more research is needed before further conclusions about intervention effectiveness and intervention content can be drawn. Future interventions should take parents, health professionals and other contextual needs into account to improve chances of success. More research on long-term effects on overweight and obesity is needed.

Funder

Aalborg University

Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement

UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence

British Heart Foundation

Economic and Social Research Council

Medical Research Council

Welsh Government

Wellcome Trust

UK Clinical Research Collaboration

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3