Clinician adherence to inflammatory bowel disease guidelines: Results of a qualitative study of barriers and enablers

Abstract

Abstract Background With the evolving IBD management landscape, it is critical that gastroenterologists keep up to date with the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Several studies in IBD have documented suboptimal adherence to CPGs. We aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of guideline adherence barriers reported by gastroenterologists and determine how evidence-based education can best be delivered. Methods Interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of gastroenterologists’ representative of the current workforce. Questions focused on previously identified problematic areas and shaped by the theoretical domains framework (TDF), a theory-informed approach to understanding clinician behaviour, to assess all determinants of behaviour. Questions explored perceived barriers to adherence and clinicians’ preferred content and modes of delivery for an educational intervention. Interviews were conducted by a single interviewer and qualitative analysis performed. Results A total of 20 interviews were conducted before data saturation was achieved (male = 12, work in a metropolitan area = 17). Five dominant subthemes for barriers to adherence emerged: negative experiences impacting future decisions, time constraints, long guidelines are impractical, unfamiliar with guideline specifics and prescribing restrictions. Adherence enablers were identified including features that improved the usability of CPGs. Computer or smart phone based educational interventions were preferred. Conclusions This study identified several barriers and enablers for IBD guideline adherence and gained insight into how gastroenterologists prefer to receive evidence-based education. These results will inform the development of a targeted intervention to improve IBD guideline adherence. Improving guideline adherence is expected to facilitate standardised IBD care, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.