A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies

Author:

Ford K L123ORCID,Albert J S4,Summers A P5,Hedrick B P6,Schachner E R7,Jones A S8,Evans K9,Chakrabarty P8101112

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University , Washington DC, USA

2. EAWAG Aquatic Research Institute , Luzern, Switzerland

3. Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Universität Bern , Bern, Switzerland

4. Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette , Louisiana, USA

5. Department of Biology, Friday Harbor Labs, University of Washington , Washington, USA

6. Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

7. Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center , Louisiana, USA

8. Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University , Louisiana, USA

9. BioSciences, Rice University , Houston, TX, USA

10. American Museum of Natural History , New York, NY, USA

11. Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History , Washington DC, USA

12. Canadian Museum of Nature , Ottowa, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

SynopsisThe increased use of imaging technology in biological research has drastically altered morphological studies in recent decades and allowed for the preservation of important collection specimens alongside detailed visualization of bony and soft-tissue structures. Despite the benefits associated with these newer imaging techniques, there remains a need for more “traditional” methods of morphological examination in many comparative studies. In this paper, we describe the costs and benefits of the various methods of visualizing, examining, and comparing morphological structures. There are significant differences not only in the costs associated with these different methods (monetary, time, equipment, and software), but also in the degree to which specimens are destroyed. We argue not for any one particular method over another in morphological studies, but instead suggest a combination of methods is useful not only for breadth of visualization, but also for the financial and time constraints often imposed on early-career research scientists.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Plant Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference52 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3