Political Values and Political Participation

Author:

Heath Anthony F.1,Richards Lindsay2,Jungblut Julia3

Affiliation:

1. Sociology, Nuffield College, Oxford

2. Sociology, University of Oxford

3. St. Anne''s College, University of Oxford

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter explores, both theoretically and empirically, the relationship between political values and two main types of political participation, namely electoral (turnout in national or local elections) and non-electoral types ( such as signing a petition, attending a demonstration or contacting a government official). The chapter focuses on left-right, libertarian-authoritarian, traditional, postmaterialist, and democratic values, and their relationships with electoral and non-electoral forms of participation. Democratic values prove to have strong associations with both forms of participation, while postmaterialist values have a particularly strong association with non-electoral participation. Left-right, libertarian-authoritarian, and traditional values also have significant negative associations with non-electoral participation, right-wingers, authoritarians and traditionalists being less likely to engage politically outside elections. Left-right and libertarian-authoritarian values also have U-shaped relationships with electoral participation, people who hold more extreme positions on these values being the most likely to turnout and vote. At the same time, the political context also matters, with the level and strength of the relationships differing between democracies and autocracies. Levels of participation (both electoral and non-electoral) are much lower in autocracies, while the strengths of the relationships with values tend to be stronger in democracies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference41 articles.

1. Practical Reason in Hard Times: The Effects of Economic Crisis on the Kinds of Lives People in the UK have Reason to Value.;Journal of Human Development and Capabilities,2016

2. Converse, P.  1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Pp. 75–169 in D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press.

3. The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour.;British Journal of Political Science,2010

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3