Affiliation:
1. Political Science, Getúlio Vargas Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract
AbstractPortugal’s experience with semi-presidentialism has been relatively stable, particularly after 1982. However, the very definition of the country’s system of government has been contested. To demonstrate this stability and map the accompanying academic debate, this chapter will first define the main systems of government found around the world. It will then go on to discuss why Portugal chose the presidential-parliamentary variant of semi-presidential system, in 1976, later adopting the premier-presidential version, in 1982. Next, it identifies the conditions that led to the consolidation and stability of the latter system, focusing on the relationships between the president, the electorate, and the prime minister and the cabinet. Subsequently, the chapter briefly evaluates how the country’s executive type has fared under the 2011–2014 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. The final section presents a conclusion and lays out an agenda for future research.
Reference52 articles.
1. C8.P52Amorim Neto, O. 2003. ‘Portugal: Changing Patterns of Delegation and Accountability Under the President’s Watchful Eyes’. In Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, edited by K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, and T. Bergman, 552–572. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Portugal’s Semi-Presidentialism (Re)Considered: An Assessment of the President’s Role in the Policy Process, 1976–2006;European Journal of Political Research,2009
3. Semi-Presidentialism in Lusophone Countries: Diffusion and Operation;Democratization,2014
4. C8.P55Araújo, A. 2003. ‘El Presidente de la República en la evolución del sistema político de Portugal’. In Portugal: democracia y sistema político, edited by A. Barreto, B. Gomez Fortes, and P. Magalhães. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno.
5. C8.P56Bruneau, T. C. 2017. ‘Civil-Military Relations in Two “Third Wave” Democracies: The First and a Follower’. In Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies: Democratic Control and Effectiveness in Comparative Perspectives, edited by Aurel Croissant and David Kuehn. Berlin: Springer.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献