Semi-Presidentialism in Portugal: Academic Quarrels amidst Institutional Stability

Author:

Amorim Neto Octavio1

Affiliation:

1. Political Science, Getúlio Vargas Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

AbstractPortugal’s experience with semi-presidentialism has been relatively stable, particularly after 1982. However, the very definition of the country’s system of government has been contested. To demonstrate this stability and map the accompanying academic debate, this chapter will first define the main systems of government found around the world. It will then go on to discuss why Portugal chose the presidential-parliamentary variant of semi-presidential system, in 1976, later adopting the premier-presidential version, in 1982. Next, it identifies the conditions that led to the consolidation and stability of the latter system, focusing on the relationships between the president, the electorate, and the prime minister and the cabinet. Subsequently, the chapter briefly evaluates how the country’s executive type has fared under the 2011–2014 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. The final section presents a conclusion and lays out an agenda for future research.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference52 articles.

1. C8.P52Amorim Neto, O.  2003. ‘Portugal: Changing Patterns of Delegation and Accountability Under the President’s Watchful Eyes’. In Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, edited by K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, and T. Bergman, 552–572. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Portugal’s Semi-Presidentialism (Re)Considered: An Assessment of the President’s Role in the Policy Process, 1976–2006;European Journal of Political Research,2009

3. Semi-Presidentialism in Lusophone Countries: Diffusion and Operation;Democratization,2014

4. C8.P55Araújo, A.  2003. ‘El Presidente de la República en la evolución del sistema político de Portugal’. In Portugal: democracia y sistema político, edited by A. Barreto, B. Gomez Fortes, and P. Magalhães. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno.

5. C8.P56Bruneau, T. C.  2017. ‘Civil-Military Relations in Two “Third Wave” Democracies: The First and a Follower’. In Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies: Democratic Control and Effectiveness in Comparative Perspectives, edited by Aurel Croissant and David Kuehn. Berlin: Springer.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3