Affiliation:
1. SOAS University of London , UK
2. University of Chicago , USA
Abstract
Abstract
States support transnational insurgents in an important variety of ways, from highly public efforts to transform the status quo to covert backing with limited ambitions. In this paper, we introduce a new theory to help explain variation in these strategies of external support. We argue that the offensive or defensive goals of state sponsors interact with their fears of escalation to shape how they support armed groups. Four strategies of state sponsorship emerge from different combinations of sponsor goals and escalation fears. We empirically investigate this argument with a unique medium-N study of Indian support and nonsupport for insurgents in South Asia. Based on fieldwork, primary sources, and specialized secondary literature, we uncover a rich landscape of links between India and armed groups in its neighborhood. We show a systematic connection between the strategies of support that India chooses with its aims in supporting rebels and its fears of escalation from doing so. However, there are mispredictions between our theory and empirical reality that we use in the conclusion to suggest new directions for research.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference97 articles.
1. Various Army Operations Launched against ULFA;Ahmed,1991
2. Rebelocracy
3. The Internationalization of Terrorist Campaigns;Bapat;Conflict Management and Peace Science,2007
4. Understanding State Sponsorship of Militant Groups;Bapat;British Journal of Political Science,2012
5. Pakistan's MQM ‘Received Indian Funding’;Bennett-Jones,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献