Author:
Buttice Matthew K.,Highton Benjamin
Abstract
Multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) is a method to estimate public opinion across geographic units from individual-level survey data. If it works with samples the size of typical national surveys, then MRP offers the possibility of analyzing many political phenomena previously believed to be outside the bounds of systematic empirical inquiry. Initial investigations of its performance with conventional national samples produce generally optimistic assessments. This article examines a larger number of cases and a greater range of opinions than in previous studies and finds substantial variation in MRP performance. Through empirical and Monte Carlo analyses, we develop an explanation for this variation. The findings suggest that the conditions necessary for MRP to perform well will not always be met. Thus, we draw a less optimistic conclusion than previous studies do regarding the use of MRP with samples of the size found in typical national surveys.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Estimating Constituency Preferences from Sparse Survey Data Using Auxiliary Geographic Information
2. The “gender gap” in state legislative representation: New data to tackle an old question;Arceneaux;Political Research Quarterly,2001
3. The explanation appears to be that for the cultural items the strength of the state-level predictors is high (averaging 0.63 versus 0.31 for the other items), as is the population ICC (averaging 0.024 versus 0.009 for the other items). Whether these conditions would hold during other time periods or when other covariates are used in the multilevel model remains an open question.
4. Public Opinion and American Democracy
5. Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness
Cited by
82 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献