Patient perspectives on a proposed pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program

Author:

Ferrari Renée M12ORCID,Atkins Dana L3,Wangen Mary4,Rohweder Catherine L4,Waters Austin R5,Correa Sara1,Richmond Jennifer6,van Rensburg Dillon7,Ittes Annika3,Odebunmi Olufeyisayo5,Issaka Rachel B38,Ceballos Rachel9,Shah Parth D3,Wheeler Stephanie B15,Brenner Alison T1410

Affiliation:

1. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

2. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Maternal and Child Health Department, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

3. Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center , Seattle, WA , USA

4. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

5. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Health Policy and Management Department, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

6. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC , USA

7. Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center , Seattle, WA , USA

8. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, WA , USA

9. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center , Seattle, WA , USA

10. Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

Abstract

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and preventable cancer. CRC screening is underutilized, particularly within medically underserved communities. Most interventions aimed at increasing CRC screening are delivered through primary care clinics. Pharmacies are more accessible than traditional primary care settings and may be ideally suited for delivering CRC screening and increasing access. Fecal immunochemical test is an at-home, stool-based CRC screening test that could be distributed through pharmacies. The purpose of our study was to assess patient perspectives on receiving fecal immunochemical test-based CRC screening through pharmacies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants residing in North Carolina and Washington. Interviews explored acceptability and intervention design preferences for a pharmacy-based CRC screening program. The interview guide was informed by Andersen’s Healthcare Utilization Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were conducted at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Patients perceived a pharmacy-based CRC screening program to be highly acceptable, citing factors such as ease of pharmacy access and avoiding co-pays for an office visit. Some concerns about privacy and coordination with patients’ primary care provider tempered acceptability. Trust and positive relationships with providers and pharmacists as well as seamless care across the CRC screening continuum also were viewed as important. Patients viewed pharmacy-based CRC screening as an acceptable option for CRC screening. To improve programmatic success, it will be important to ensure privacy, determine how communication between the pharmacy and the patient’s provider will take place, and establish closed-loop care, particularly for patients with abnormal results.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Safeway Foundation to Fred Hutch

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Cancer Institute

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

University of North Carolina

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology

Reference51 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2021;Siegel,2021

2. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement;Davidson,2021

3. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force;Lin,2021

4. Colorectal cancer screening: an updated modeling study for the US preventive services task force;Knudsen,2021

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3