Patient Willingness to Use a Pharmacy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Service: A National Survey of U.S. Adults

Author:

Shah Parth D.12ORCID,Wangen Mary3ORCID,Rohweder Catherine L.3ORCID,Waters Austin R.45ORCID,Odebunmi Olufeyisayo O.45ORCID,Marciniak Macary W.6ORCID,Ferrari Renée M.57ORCID,Wheeler Stephanie B.345ORCID,Brenner Alison T.358ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.

2. 2Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.

3. 3Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

4. 4Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

5. 5UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

6. 6Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

7. 7Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

8. 8Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Abstract

Abstract Background: We aimed to understand U.S. adults’ willingness to use a pharmacy-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT) distribution service for routine colorectal cancer screening called PharmFIT using Diffusion of Innovation Theory, evaluating patient's appraisals of the program's relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity. Methods: From March to April 2021, we conducted a national online survey of 1,045 U.S. adults ages 45 to 75. We identified correlates of patient willingness to use PharmFIT using structural equation modeling. Results: Most respondents (72%) were willing to get a FIT from their pharmacy for their regular colorectal cancer screening. Respondents were more willing to participate in PharmFIT if they perceived higher relative advantage ($\hat{\beta}$= 0.184; confidence interval, CI95%: 0.055–0.325) and perceived higher compatibility ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.422; CI95%: 0.253–0.599) to get screened in a pharmacy, had longer travel times to their primary health care provider ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.007; CI95%: 0.004–0.010). Respondents were less willing to participate in PharmFIT if they were 65 years or older ($\hat{\beta}$ = −0.220; CI95%: −0.362 to −0.070). Conclusions: Most U.S. adults would be willing to participate in PharmFIT for their routine colorectal cancer screening. Patient perceptions of the relative advantage and compatibility of PharmFIT were strongly associated with their willingness to use PharmFIT. Pharmacies should account for patient preferences for these two traits of PharmFIT to increase adoption and use. Impact: Pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening may be a viable public health strategy to significantly increase equitable access to screening for U.S. residents.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Safeway Foundation

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Reference33 articles.

1. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement;Davidson;JAMA,2021

2. Data & progress;National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable,2023

3. Pharmacists as accessible healthcare providers: quantifying the opportunity;Valliant;J Manag Care Spec Pharm,2022

4. Access to community pharmacies: a nationwide geographic information systems cross-sectional analysis;Berenbrok;J Am Pharm Assoc (2003),2022

5. View of exploring accessibility of community pharmacy services;Kelling;Inov Pharm,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Colorectal cancer screening knowledge among community pharmacists: A national survey;Journal of the American Pharmacists Association;2024-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3