Abstract
AbstractThe Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prohibits U.S.-related firms from making bribes abroad. We analyze the FCPA’s effects in a model of competition between a U.S. and foreign firm for contracts in a host country. If the FCPA only applies to the U.S. firm, it reduces that firm’s competitiveness and either increases bribery by the foreign firm or reduces overall investment. If the FCPA also applies to foreign firms, it reduces total bribery, and in host countries with high corruption levels, it increases total investment. The model suggests that the FCPA will deter bribery and stimulate investment while not disadvantaging U.S. firms if its enforcement is aimed at firms who engaged in bribery in highly corrupt countries and whose main competitors are also subject to the FCPA.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference30 articles.
1. Multi-activity Contests;Arbatskaya,;Economic Theory,2010
2. Dynamic Multi-activity Contests;Arbatskaya,;Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2012
3. Asymmetric Punishment as an Instrument of Corruption Control;Basu,;Journal of Public Economic Theory,2016
4. Rigging the Lobbying Process: An Application of the All-Pay Auction;Baye,;American Economic Review,1993
5. A Free Press is Bad News for Corruption;Brunetti,;Journal of Public Economics,2003
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献