Affiliation:
1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , USA
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, I investigate backward-looking accounts of death's badness. I begin by reviewing deprivationism—the standard, forward-looking account of death's badness. On deprivationism, death is bad for its victims when it deprives them of a good future. This account famously faces two problems—Lucretius’s symmetry problem and the preemption problem. This motivates turning to backward-looking accounts of death's badness on which death is bad for its victim (in a respect) when it involves a decline from a good life. I distinguish three different backward-looking accounts of death's badness in terms of decline, and I argue for the attractiveness of one in particular. I conclude by considering how the backward-looking consideration of decline might factor into our overall account of death's badness.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference21 articles.
1. Asymmetry and Non-Existence;Belshaw;Philosophical Studies,1993
2. Well-Being and Death
3. Why is Death Bad?;Brueckner;Philosophical Studies,1986
4. How A-Theoretic Deprivationists Should Respond to Lucretius;Deng;Journal of the American Philosophical Association,2015
5. Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death;Feldman;The Philosophical Review,1991
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Is Discrimination Harmful?;American Philosophical Quarterly;2024-07-01