Abstract
ABSTRACT:What, if anything, makes death bad for the deceased themselves? Deprivationists hold that death is bad for the deceased iff it deprives them of intrinsic goods they would have enjoyed had they lived longer. This view faces the problem that birth too seems to deprive one of goods one would have enjoyed had one been born earlier, so that it too should be bad for one. There are two main approaches to the problem. In this paper, I explore the second approach, by Anthony Brueckner and John Martin Fischer, and suggest that it can be developed so as to meet deprivationists’ needs. On the resulting view, metaphysical differences between the future and the past give rise to a corresponding axiological difference in the intrinsic value of future and past experiences. As experiences move into the past, they lose their intrinsic value for the person.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Death and Decline;The Philosophical Quarterly;2022-04-05
2. Lucretian Puzzles;Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy;2021-12-13
3. Four-dimensionalism, eternalism, and deprivationist accounts of the evil of death;Synthese;2021-09-07
4. Faces of Death: Lucretius, Religio, and Vision at Rome;SENSORIVM: The Senses in Roman Polytheism;2021-05-20
5. The Lucretian Puzzle and the Nature of Time;The Journal of Ethics;2017-02-09