Measuring time clinicians spend using EHRs in the inpatient setting: a national, mixed-methods study

Author:

Cohen Genna R1,Boi Jessica2,Johnson Christian3,Brown Llew1,Patel Vaishali3

Affiliation:

1. Mathematica, Washington, DC, USA

2. Mathematica, Chicago, IL, USA

3. Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC), Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective To understand hospitals’ use of EHR audit-log-based measures to address burden associated with inpatient EHR use. Materials and Methods Using mixed methods, we analyzed 2018 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement Survey data (n = 2864 hospitals; 64% response rate) to characterize measures used and provided by EHR vendors to track clinician time spent documenting. We interviewed staff from the top 3 EHR vendors that provided these measures. Multivariable analyses identified variation in use of the measures among hospitals with these 3 vendors. Results 53% of hospitals reported using EHR data to track clinician time documenting, compared to 68% of the hospitals using the EHR from the top 3 vendors. Among hospitals with EHRs from these vendors, usage was significantly lower among rural hospitals and independent hospitals (P < .05). Two of these vendors provided measures of time spent doing specific tasks while the third measured an aggregate of auditable activities. Vendors varied in the underlying data used to create measures, measure specification, and data displays. Discussion Tools to track clinicians’ documentation time are becoming more available. The measures provided differ across vendors and disparities in use exist across hospitals. Increasing the specificity of standards underlying the data would support a common set of core measures making these measures more widely available. Conclusion Although half of US hospitals use measures of time spent in the EHR derived from EHR generated data, work remains to make such measures and analyses more broadly available to all hospitals and to increase its utility for national burden measurement.

Funder

ONC

A+ Government Solutions, LLC

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference15 articles.

1. Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital “advanced use” divide;Adler-Milstein;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2017

2. Care-centered clinical documentation in the digital environment: solutions to alleviate burnout;Ommaya;NAM Perspectives. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine,2018

3. Using electronic health record audit logs to study clinical activity: a systematic review of aims, measures, and methods;Rule;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2020

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3