Physician EHR Time and Visit Volume Following Adoption of Team-Based Documentation Support

Author:

Apathy Nate C.1,Holmgren A. Jay2,Cross Dori A.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park

2. Division of Clinical Informatics and Digital Transformation, University of California, San Francisco

3. Division of Health Policy & Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis

Abstract

ImportancePhysicians spend the plurality of active electronic health record (EHR) time on documentation. Excessive documentation limits time spent with patients and is associated with burnout. Organizations need effective strategies to reduce physician documentation burden; however, evidence on team-based documentation (eg, medical scribes) has been limited to small, single-institution studies lacking rigorous estimates of how documentation support changes EHR time and visit volume.ObjectivesTo analyze how EHR documentation time and visit volume change following the adoption of team-based documentation approaches.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis national longitudinal cohort study analyzed physician-week EHR metadata from September 2020 through April 2021. A 2-way fixed-effects difference-in-differences regression approach was used to analyze changes in the main outcomes after team-based documentation support adoption. Event study regression models were used to examine variation in changes over time and stratified models to analyze the moderating role of support intensity. The sample included US ambulatory physicians using the EHR. Data were analyzed between October 2022 and September 2023.ExposureTeam-based documentation support, defined as new onset and consistent use of coauthored documentation with another clinical team member.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes included weekly visit volume, EHR documentation time, total EHR time, and EHR time outside clinic hours.ResultsOf 18 265 physicians, 1024 physicians adopted team-based documentation support, with 17 241 comparison physicians who did not adopt such support. The sample included 57.2% primary care physicians, 31.6% medical specialists, and 11.2% surgical specialists; 40.0% practiced in academic settings and 18.4% in outpatient safety-net settings. For adopter physicians, visit volume increased by 6.0% (2.5 visits/wk [95% CI, 1.9-3.0]; P < .001), and documentation time decreased by 9.1% (23.3 min/wk [95% CI, −30.3 to −16.2]; P < .001). Following a 20-week postadoption learning period, visits per week increased by 10.8% and documentation time decreased by 16.2%. Only high-intensity adopters (>40% of note text authored by others) realized reductions in documentation time, both for the full postadoption period (−53.9 min/wk [95% CI, −65.3 to −42.4]; 21.0% decrease; P < .001) and following the learning period (−72.2 min/wk; 28.1% decrease). Low adopters saw no meaningful change in EHR time but realized a similar increase in visit volume.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this national longitudinal cohort study, physicians who adopted team-based documentation experienced increased visit volume and reduced documentation and EHR time, especially after a learning period.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3