Patient characteristics associated with objective measures of digital health tool use in the United States: A literature review

Author:

Nouri Sarah S1,Adler-Milstein Julia2,Thao Crishyashi2,Acharya Prasad3,Barr-Walker Jill4,Sarkar Urmimala15,Lyles Courtney15

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

2. Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

3. Chronic Disease Control Branch, Center for Healthy Communities, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, USA

4. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital Library, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

5. UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective The study sought to determine which patient characteristics are associated with the use of patient-facing digital health tools in the United States. Materials and Methods We conducted a literature review of studies of patient-facing digital health tools that objectively evaluated use (eg, system/platform data representing frequency of use) by patient characteristics (eg, age, race or ethnicity, income, digital literacy). We included any type of patient-facing digital health tool except patient portals. We reran results using the subset of studies identified as having robust methodology to detect differences in patient characteristics. Results We included 29 studies; 13 had robust methodology. Most studies examined smartphone apps and text messaging programs for chronic disease management and evaluated only 1-3 patient characteristics, primarily age and gender. Overall, the majority of studies found no association between patient characteristics and use. Among the subset with robust methodology, white race and poor health status appeared to be associated with higher use. Discussion Given the substantial investment in digital health tools, it is surprising how little is known about the types of patients who use them. Strategies that engage diverse populations in digital health tool use appear to be needed. Conclusion Few studies evaluate objective measures of digital health tool use by patient characteristics, and those that do include a narrow range of characteristics. Evidence suggests that resources and need drive use.

Funder

Commonwealth Fund

National Research Service Award fellowship training grant

National Library of Medicine

National Cancer Institute

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Health Resources and Services Administration

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3