EvidenceMap: a three-level knowledge representation for medical evidence computation and comprehension

Author:

Kang Tian1,Sun Yingcheng1ORCID,Kim Jae Hyun1,Ta Casey1ORCID,Perotte Adler1ORCID,Schiffer Kayla1,Wu Mutong2,Zhao Yang2,Moustafa-Fahmy Nour2,Peng Yifan3ORCID,Weng Chunhua1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University , New York, New York, USA

2. Department of Statistics, Columbia University , New York, New York, USA

3. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, New York, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective To develop a computable representation for medical evidence and to contribute a gold standard dataset of annotated randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts, along with a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline for transforming free-text RCT evidence in PubMed into the structured representation. Materials and methods Our representation, EvidenceMap, consists of 3 levels of abstraction: Medical Evidence Entity, Proposition and Map, to represent the hierarchical structure of medical evidence composition. Randomly selected RCT abstracts were annotated following EvidenceMap based on the consensus of 2 independent annotators to train an NLP pipeline. Via a user study, we measured how the EvidenceMap improved evidence comprehension and analyzed its representative capacity by comparing the evidence annotation with EvidenceMap representation and without following any specific guidelines. Results Two corpora including 229 disease-agnostic and 80 COVID-19 RCT abstracts were annotated, yielding 12 725 entities and 1602 propositions. EvidenceMap saves users 51.9% of the time compared to reading raw-text abstracts. Most evidence elements identified during the freeform annotation were successfully represented by EvidenceMap, and users gave the enrollment, study design, and study Results sections mean 5-scale Likert ratings of 4.85, 4.70, and 4.20, respectively. The end-to-end evaluations of the pipeline show that the evidence proposition formulation achieves F1 scores of 0.84 and 0.86 in the adjusted random index score. Conclusions EvidenceMap extends the participant, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework into 3 levels of abstraction for transforming free-text evidence from the clinical literature into a computable structure. It can be used as an interoperable format for better evidence retrieval and synthesis and an interpretable representation to efficiently comprehend RCT findings.

Funder

Bridging the semantic gap between research eligibility criteria and clinical data

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference38 articles.

1. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine;Burns;Plast Reconstr Surg,2011

2. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions;Schardt;BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2007

3. Beyond genes, proteins, and abstracts: identifying scientific claims from full-text biomedical articles;Blake;J Biomed Inform,2010

4. Classification of PICO elements by text features systematically extracted from PubMed abstracts;Huang,2011

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3