RefAI: a GPT-powered retrieval-augmented generative tool for biomedical literature recommendation and summarization

Author:

Li Yiming1ORCID,Zhao Jeff2,Li Manqi13,Dang Yifang1ORCID,Yu Evan1,Li Jianfu4,Sun Zenan1ORCID,Hussein Usama5,Wen Jianguo1,Abdelhameed Ahmed M4,Mai Junhua6,Li Shenduo7,Yu Yue8,Hu Xinyue4,Yang Daowei9,Feng Jingna4,Li Zehan1,He Jianping1,Tao Wei3,Duan Tiehang4,Lou Yanyan7,Li Fang4ORCID,Tao Cui4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , Houston, TX 77030, United States

2. Department of Computer Science, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX 78712, United States

3. Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , Houston, TX 77030, United States

4. Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic , Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States

5. Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX 77030, United States

6. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Academic Institute , Houston, TX 77030, United States

7. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States

8. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN 55905, United States

9. Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX 77030, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Precise literature recommendation and summarization are crucial for biomedical professionals. While the latest iteration of generative pretrained transformer (GPT) incorporates 2 distinct modes—real-time search and pretrained model utilization—it encounters challenges in dealing with these tasks. Specifically, the real-time search can pinpoint some relevant articles but occasionally provides fabricated papers, whereas the pretrained model excels in generating well-structured summaries but struggles to cite specific sources. In response, this study introduces RefAI, an innovative retrieval-augmented generative tool designed to synergize the strengths of large language models (LLMs) while overcoming their limitations. Materials and Methods RefAI utilized PubMed for systematic literature retrieval, employed a novel multivariable algorithm for article recommendation, and leveraged GPT-4 turbo for summarization. Ten queries under 2 prevalent topics (“cancer immunotherapy and target therapy” and “LLMs in medicine”) were chosen as use cases and 3 established counterparts (ChatGPT-4, ScholarAI, and Gemini) as our baselines. The evaluation was conducted by 10 domain experts through standard statistical analyses for performance comparison. Results The overall performance of RefAI surpassed that of the baselines across 5 evaluated dimensions—relevance and quality for literature recommendation, accuracy, comprehensiveness, and reference integration for summarization, with the majority exhibiting statistically significant improvements (P-values <.05). Discussion RefAI demonstrated substantial improvements in literature recommendation and summarization over existing tools, addressing issues like fabricated papers, metadata inaccuracies, restricted recommendations, and poor reference integration. Conclusion By augmenting LLM with external resources and a novel ranking algorithm, RefAI is uniquely capable of recommending high-quality literature and generating well-structured summaries, holding the potential to meet the critical needs of biomedical professionals in navigating and synthesizing vast amounts of scientific literature.

Funder

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Institutes of Health

American Heart Association

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference44 articles.

1. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws;Alberts;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2014

2. Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Review Checklist;Leite;Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil),2019

3. A guide to writing the dissertation literature review;Randolph;Pract Assess Res Eval,2009

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3