Machine learning classification of diagnostic accuracy in pathologists interpreting breast biopsies

Author:

Brunyé Tad T12,Booth Kelsey1,Hendel Dalit1,Kerr Kathleen F3ORCID,Shucard Hannah3,Weaver Donald L4,Elmore Joann G5

Affiliation:

1. Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University , Medford, MA 02155, United States

2. Department of Psychology, Tufts University , Medford, MA 02155, United States

3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington , Seattle, WA 98105, United States

4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont and Vermont Cancer Center , Burlington, VT 05405, United States

5. Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study explores the feasibility of using machine learning to predict accurate versus inaccurate diagnoses made by pathologists based on their spatiotemporal viewing behavior when evaluating digital breast biopsy images. Materials and Methods The study gathered data from 140 pathologists of varying experience levels who each reviewed a set of 14 digital whole slide images of breast biopsy tissue. Pathologists’ viewing behavior, including zooming and panning actions, was recorded during image evaluation. A total of 30 features were extracted from the viewing behavior data, and 4 machine learning algorithms were used to build classifiers for predicting diagnostic accuracy. Results The Random Forest classifier demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving a test accuracy of 0.81 and area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.86. Features related to attention distribution and focus on critical regions of interest were found to be important predictors of diagnostic accuracy. Further including case-level and pathologist-level information incrementally improved classifier performance. Discussion Results suggest that pathologists’ viewing behavior during digital image evaluation can be leveraged to predict diagnostic accuracy, affording automated feedback and decision support systems based on viewing behavior to aid in training and, ultimately, clinical practice. They also carry implications for basic research examining the interplay between perception, thought, and action in diagnostic decision-making. Conclusion The classifiers developed herein have potential applications in training and clinical settings to provide timely feedback and support to pathologists during diagnostic decision-making. Further research could explore the generalizability of these findings to other medical domains and varied levels of expertise.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3