Clinical pathways for primary care: current use, interest and perceived usability

Author:

Toy Jennifer M1,Drechsler Adam2,Waters Richard C3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

2. Capital Family Medicine, Raleigh, NC 27609, USA

3. Site medical director, Homeless Services Programs, Neighborcare Health, Seattle, WA 98144, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Translating clinical evidence to daily practice remains a challenge and may improve with clinical pathways. We assessed interest in and usability of clinical pathways by primary care professionals. Methods An online survey was created. Interest in pathways for patient care and learning was assessed at start and finish. Participants completed baseline questions then pathway-associated question sets related to management of 2 chronic diseases. Perceived pathway usability was assessed using the system usability scale. Accuracy and confidence of answers was compared for baseline and pathway-assisted questions. Results Of 115 participants, 17.4% had used clinical pathways, the lowest of decision support tool types surveyed. Accuracy and confidence in answers significantly improved for all pathways. Interest in using pathways daily or weekly was above 75% for the respondents. Conclusion There is low utilization of, but high interest in, clinical pathways by primary care clinicians. Pathways improve accuracy and confidence in answering written clinical questions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference22 articles.

1. Slowing the growth of health care costs–lessons from regional variation;Fisher;N Engl J Med,2009

2. The meaning of translational research and why it matters;Woolf;JAMA,2008

3. What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review;Lawal;BMC Med,2016

4. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs;Rotter;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3