Development and Validity Testing of a Matrix to Evaluate Maturity of Clinical Pathways: A Case Study in Saskatchewan, Canada

Author:

Larson Crystal Lynn1,Vanstone Jason Robert1,Mise Taysa-Rhea1,Tupper Susan Mary2,Groot Gary2,Azizian Amir Reza2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Excellence, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

2. Clinical Excellence, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare systems are transforming into learning health systems that use data-driven and research-informed approaches to achieve continuous improvement. One of these approaches is the use of clinical pathways, which are tools to standardize care for a specific population and improve healthcare quality. Evaluating the maturity of clinical pathways is necessary to inform pathway development teams and health system decision makers about required pathway revisions or implementation supports. Main body In an effort to improve the development, implementation, and sustainability of provincial clinical pathways, we developed a clinical pathways maturity evaluation matrix. To explore the initial content and face validity of the matrix, we used it to evaluate a case pathway within a provincial health authority in Saskatchewan, Canada. Iterative cycles of feedback were gathered from stakeholders and patient and family partners to rank, retain, or remove sub-enablers of the draft matrix. We tested the matrix on the Chronic Pain Pathway (CPP) for primary care in a local pilot area and revised the matrix based on feedback from the CPP development team leader. The final matrix contains five enablers (i.e., Design, Ownership and Performer, Infrastructure, Performance Management, and Culture), 20 sub-enablers, and three trajectory definitions for each sub-enabler. Supplemental documents were created for six sub-enablers. The CPP scored 15 out of 40 possible points of maturity. Although the pathway scored highest in the Design enabler (10/12), it requires more attention in several areas, specifically the Ownership and Performer and the Performance Management enablers, each of which scored zero. Additionally, the Infrastructure and Culture enablers scored 2/4 and 3/8 points, respectively. These areas of the CPP are in need of improvement in order to enhance the overall maturity of the CPP. Short conclusion We developed a clinical pathways maturity matrix to evaluate the various dimensions of clinical pathways’ development and implementation. The goals of this initial work were to develop and validate a tool to assess the maturity and readiness of new or existing pathways and to track pathways' revisions and improvements.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. A framework for value-creating learning health systems;Menear M;Health Res Policy Syst,2019

2. Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America, Institute of Medicine. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America [Internet]. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 [cited 2023 May 3]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207225/

3. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System;Friedman C;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2015

4. A roadmap to operationalize and evaluate impact in a learning health system;Allen C;Learn Health Syst,2021

5. A framework for understanding, designing, developing and evaluating learning health systems;Foley T;Learn Health Syst,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3