Affiliation:
1. Clinical Excellence, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
2. Clinical Excellence, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Healthcare systems are transforming into learning health systems that use data-driven and research-informed approaches to achieve continuous improvement. One of these approaches is the use of clinical pathways, which are tools to standardize care for a specific population and improve healthcare quality. Evaluating the maturity of clinical pathways is necessary to inform pathway development teams and health system decision makers about required pathway revisions or implementation supports.
Main body
In an effort to improve the development, implementation, and sustainability of provincial clinical pathways, we developed a clinical pathways maturity evaluation matrix. To explore the initial content and face validity of the matrix, we used it to evaluate a case pathway within a provincial health authority in Saskatchewan, Canada.
Iterative cycles of feedback were gathered from stakeholders and patient and family partners to rank, retain, or remove sub-enablers of the draft matrix. We tested the matrix on the Chronic Pain Pathway (CPP) for primary care in a local pilot area and revised the matrix based on feedback from the CPP development team leader. The final matrix contains five enablers (i.e., Design, Ownership and Performer, Infrastructure, Performance Management, and Culture), 20 sub-enablers, and three trajectory definitions for each sub-enabler. Supplemental documents were created for six sub-enablers.
The CPP scored 15 out of 40 possible points of maturity. Although the pathway scored highest in the Design enabler (10/12), it requires more attention in several areas, specifically the Ownership and Performer and the Performance Management enablers, each of which scored zero. Additionally, the Infrastructure and Culture enablers scored 2/4 and 3/8 points, respectively. These areas of the CPP are in need of improvement in order to enhance the overall maturity of the CPP.
Short conclusion
We developed a clinical pathways maturity matrix to evaluate the various dimensions of clinical pathways’ development and implementation. The goals of this initial work were to develop and validate a tool to assess the maturity and readiness of new or existing pathways and to track pathways' revisions and improvements.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. A framework for value-creating learning health systems;Menear M;Health Res Policy Syst,2019
2. Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America, Institute of Medicine. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America [Internet]. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 [cited 2023 May 3]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207225/
3. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System;Friedman C;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2015
4. A roadmap to operationalize and evaluate impact in a learning health system;Allen C;Learn Health Syst,2021
5. A framework for understanding, designing, developing and evaluating learning health systems;Foley T;Learn Health Syst,2023