OrderRex: clinical order decision support and outcome predictions by data-mining electronic medical records

Author:

Chen Jonathan H12,Podchiyska Tanya3,Altman Russ B4

Affiliation:

1. Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA

2. Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research (PCOR), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

3. Biomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

4. Departments of Bioengineering, Genetics, and Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To answer a “grand challenge” in clinical decision support, the authors produced a recommender system that automatically data-mines inpatient decision support from electronic medical records (EMR), analogous to Netflix or Amazon.com’s product recommender. Materials and Methods: EMR data were extracted from 1 year of hospitalizations (>18K patients with >5.4M structured items including clinical orders, lab results, and diagnosis codes). Association statistics were counted for the ∼1.5K most common items to drive an order recommender. The authors assessed the recommender’s ability to predict hospital admission orders and outcomes based on initial encounter data from separate validation patients. Results: Compared to a reference benchmark of using the overall most common orders, the recommender using temporal relationships improves precision at 10 recommendations from 33% to 38% ( P  < 10 −10 ) for hospital admission orders. Relative risk-based association methods improve inverse frequency weighted recall from 4% to 16% ( P  < 10 −16 ). The framework yields a prediction receiver operating characteristic area under curve (c-statistic) of 0.84 for 30 day mortality, 0.84 for 1 week need for ICU life support, 0.80 for 1 week hospital discharge, and 0.68 for 30-day readmission. Discussion: Recommender results quantitatively improve on reference benchmarks and qualitatively appear clinically reasonable. The method assumes that aggregate decision making converges appropriately, but ongoing evaluation is necessary to discern common behaviors from “correct” ones. Conclusions: Collaborative filtering recommender algorithms generate clinical decision support that is predictive of real practice patterns and clinical outcomes. Incorporating temporal relationships improves accuracy. Different evaluation metrics satisfy different goals (predicting likely events vs. “interesting” suggestions).

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference53 articles.

1. Eliminating the ‘expensive’ adjective for clinical trials;Lauer;Am Heart J,,2014

2. Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology;Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC),2014

3. A ‘green button’ for using aggregate patient data at the point of care;Longhurst;Health Aff.,2014

4. Evidence-based medicine in the EMR era;Frankovich;N Engl J Med.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3