Measures of electronic health record use in outpatient settings across vendors

Author:

Baxter Sally L12ORCID,Apathy Nate C3456,Cross Dori A7,Sinsky Christine8,Hribar Michelle R9

Affiliation:

1. Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

2. Health Sciences Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

4. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

5. Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

6. At the time this project was completed, Dr. Apathy was a doctoral candidate in the Department of Health Policy & Management at the University of Indiana Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health

7. Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

8. American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA

9. Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA

Abstract

Abstract Electronic health record (EHR) log data capture clinical workflows and are a rich source of information to understand variation in practice patterns. Variation in how EHRs are used to document and support care delivery is associated with clinical and operational outcomes, including measures of provider well-being and burnout. Standardized measures that describe EHR use would facilitate generalizability and cross-institution, cross-vendor research. Here, we describe the current state of outpatient EHR use measures offered by various EHR vendors, guided by our prior conceptual work that proposed seven core measures to describe EHR use. We evaluate these measures and other reporting options provided by vendors for maturity and similarity to previously proposed standardized measures. Working toward improved standardization of EHR use measures can enable and accelerate high-impact research on physician burnout and job satisfaction as well as organizational efficiency and patient health.

Funder

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3