An analysis of patient-provider secure messaging at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers: message content and resolution through secure messaging

Author:

Shimada Stephanie L123,Petrakis Beth Ann1,Rothendler James A1,Zirkle Maryan4,Zhao Shibei1,Feng Hua1,Fix Gemmae M1,Ozkaynak Mustafa5,Martin Tracey6,Johnson Sharon A7,Tulu Bengisu7,Gordon Howard S89,Simon Steven R1,Woods Susan S10

Affiliation:

1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, USA

2. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

3. Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Bedford, MA, USA

4. Portland VA Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland, OR, USA

5. College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA

6. VISN1, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, USA

7. School of Business, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

8. Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Chicago, IL, USA

9. Division of Academic Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

10. VA Maine Healthcare System, Connected Care Office, Veterans Health Administration, Augusta, ME, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective: We sought to understand how patients and primary care teams use secure messaging (SM) to communicate with one another by analyzing secure message threads from 2 Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Methods: We coded 1000 threads of SM communication sampled from 40 primary care teams. Results: Most threads (94.5%) were initiated by patients (90.4%) or caregivers (4.1%); only 5.5% were initiated by primary care team members proactively reaching out to patients. Medication renewals and refills (47.2%), scheduling requests (17.6%), medication issues (12.9%), and health issues (12.7%) were the most common patient-initiated requests, followed by referrals (7.0%), administrative issues (6.5%), test results (5.4%), test issues (5.2%), informing messages (4.9%), comments about the patient portal or SM (4.1%), appreciation (3.9%), self-reported data (2.8%), life issues (1.5%), and complaints (1.5%). Very few messages were clinically urgent (0.7%) or contained other potentially challenging content. Message threads were mostly short (2.7 messages), comprising an average of 1.35 discrete content types. A substantial proportion of issues (24.2%) did not show any evidence of being resolved through SM. Time to response and extent of resolution via SM varied by message content. Proactive SM use by teams varied, but was most often for test results (32.7%), medication-related issues (21.8%), medication renewals (16.4%), or scheduling issues (18.2%). Conclusions: The majority of messages were transactional and initiated by patients or caregivers. Not all content categories were fully addressed over SM. Further education and training for both patients and clinical teams could improve the quality and efficiency of SM communication.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3