Patient safety and quality improvement: Ethical principles for a regulatory approach to bias in healthcare machine learning

Author:

McCradden Melissa D1ORCID,Joshi Shalmali2,Anderson James A134,Mazwi Mjaye5,Goldenberg Anna2678,Zlotnik Shaul Randi1910

Affiliation:

1. Bioethics Department, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. CIFAR, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

10. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Accumulating evidence demonstrates the impact of bias that reflects social inequality on the performance of machine learning (ML) models in health care. Given their intended placement within healthcare decision making more broadly, ML tools require attention to adequately quantify the impact of bias and reduce its potential to exacerbate inequalities. We suggest that taking a patient safety and quality improvement approach to bias can support the quantification of bias-related effects on ML. Drawing from the ethical principles underpinning these approaches, we argue that patient safety and quality improvement lenses support the quantification of relevant performance metrics, in order to minimize harm while promoting accountability, justice, and transparency. We identify specific methods for operationalizing these principles with the goal of attending to bias to support better decision making in light of controllable and uncontrollable factors.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. AI in Radiology: Navigating Medical Responsibility;Diagnostics;2024-07-12

2. Bridging Health Disparities in the Data-Driven World of Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review;Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities;2024-07-02

3. From pixels to prognosis: unlocking the potential of deep learning in fibrotic lung disease imaging analysis;British Journal of Radiology;2024-05-23

4. Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications for Healthcare and Goodness;Advances in Healthcare Information Systems and Administration;2024-04-26

5. Objective metrics for ethical AI: a systematic literature review;International Journal of Data Science and Analytics;2024-04-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3