Objective metrics for ethical AI: a systematic literature review
-
Published:2024-04-13
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2364-415X
-
Container-title:International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int J Data Sci Anal
Author:
Palumbo Guilherme,Carneiro Davide,Alves Victor
Abstract
AbstractThe field of AI Ethics has recently gained considerable attention, yet much of the existing academic research lacks practical and objective contributions for the development of ethical AI systems. This systematic literature review aims to identify and map objective metrics documented in literature between January 2018 and June 2023, specifically focusing on the ethical principles outlined in the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. The review was based on 66 articles retrieved from the Scopus and World of Science databases. The articles were categorized based on their alignment with seven ethical principles: Human Agency and Oversight, Technical Robustness and Safety, Privacy and Data Governance, Transparency, Diversity, Non-Discrimination and Fairness, Societal and Environmental Well-being, and Accountability. Of the identified articles, only a minority presented objective metrics to assess AI ethics, with the majority being purely theoretical works. Moreover, existing metrics are primarily concentrating on Diversity, Non-Discrimination and Fairness, with a clear under-representation of the remaining principles. This lack of practical contributions makes it difficult for Data Scientists to devise systems that can be deemed Ethical, or to monitor the alignment of existing systems with current guidelines and legislation. With this work, we lay out the current panorama concerning objective metrics to quantify AI Ethics in Data Science and highlight the areas in which future developments are needed to align Data Science projects with the human values widely posited in the literature.
Funder
Fundae a Tecnologia NextGeneration EU
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Gichoya, J.W., Banerjee, I., Bhimireddy, A.R., Burns, J.L., Celi, L.A., Chen, L.-C., Correa, R., Dullerud, N., Ghassemi, M., Huang, S.-C., et al.: AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging: a modelling study. Lancet Digit. Health 4(6), 406–414 (2022) 2. Hunkenschroer, A.L., Luetge, C.: Ethics of AI-enabled recruiting and selection: a review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 178, 977–1007 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05049-6 3. Barrett, C., Boyd, B., Bursztein, E., Carlini, N., Chen, B., Choi, J., Chowdhury, A.R., Christodorescu, M., Datta, A., Feizi, S., Fisher, K., Hashimoto, T., Hendrycks, D., Jha, S., Kang, D., Kerschbaum, F., Mitchell, E., Mitchell, J., Ramzan, Z., Shams, K., Song, D., Taly, A., Yang, D.: Identifying and mitigating the security risks of generative AI. Found. Trends Privacy Secur. 6(1), 1–52 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1561/3300000041 4. CDEI: The roadmap to an effective AI assurance ecosystem - GOV.UK (2021) 5. BridgeAI, I.U.: Report on the core principles and opportunities for responsible and trustworthy AI (2023)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|