Why and how is the power of Big Tech increasing in the policy process? The case of generative AI

Author:

Khanal Shaleen1ORCID,Zhang Hongzhou2ORCID,Taeihagh Araz1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore , Singapore, Singapore

2. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Abstract The growing digitalization of our society has led to a meteoric rise of large technology companies (Big Tech), which have amassed tremendous wealth and influence through their ownership of digital infrastructure and platforms. The recent launch of ChatGPT and the rapid popularization of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) act as a focusing event to further accelerate the concentration of power in the hands of the Big Tech. By using Kingdon’s multiple streams framework, this article investigates how Big Tech utilize their technological monopoly and political influence to reshape the policy landscape and establish themselves as key actors in the policy process. It explores the implications of the rise of Big Tech for policy theory in two ways. First, it develops the Big Tech-centric technology stream, highlighting the differing motivations and activities from the traditional innovation-centric technology stream. Second, it underscores the universality of Big Tech exerting ubiquitous influence within and across streams, to primarily serve their self-interests rather than promote innovation. Our findings emphasize the need for a more critical exploration of policy role of Big Tech to ensure balanced and effective policy outcomes in the age of AI.

Funder

Ministry of Education - Singapore

National Research Foundation Singapore

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference92 articles.

1. MOH agency IHiS, Microsoft to develop AI tool to help healthcare workers in Singapore;Abdullah,2023

2. The growing influence of industry in AI research;Ahmed;Science,2023

3. Content moderation as a political issue: The twitter discourse around Trump’s Ban;Alizadeh;Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media,2022

4. The lobby network—Big Tech’s web of influence in the EU;Bank,2021

5. Ideas as coalition magnets: Coalition building, policy entrepreneurs, and power relations;Béland;Journal of European Public Policy,2016

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3