ART in Europe, 2018: results generated from European registries by ESHRE
Author:
, Gliozheni Orion, Hambartsoumian Eduard, Strohmer Heinz, Petrovskaya Elena, Tishkevich Oleg, de Neubourg Diane, Bogaerts Kris, Balic Devleta, Sibincic Sanja, Antonova Irena, Vrcic Hrvoje, Ljiljak Dejan, Rezabek Karel, Markova Jitka, Kirk John, Sõritsa Deniss, Gissler Mika, Pelkonen Sari, de Mouzon Jacques, Tandler Andreas, Vrachnis Nikos, Urbancsek Janos, Kosztolanyi G, Bjorgvinsson Hilmar, Wingfield Mary, Leyden Joyce, Scaravelli Giulia, de Luca Roberto, Lokshin Vyacheslav, Karibayeva Sholpan, Magomedova Valeria, Bausyte Raminta, Masliukaite Ieva, Schilling Caroline, Calleja-Agius Jean, Moshin Veaceslav, Simic Tatjana Motrenko, Vukicevic Dragana, Smeenk Jesper M J, Petanovski Zoranco, Romundstad Liv Bente, Janicka Anna, Calhaz-Jorge Carlos, Guimaraes Joana Maria Mesquita, Laranjeira Ana Rita, Rugescu Ioana, Doroftei Bogdan, Korsak Vladislav, Vidakovic Snezana, Kovacic Borut, Sáiz Irene Cuevas, Mondéjar Fernando Prados, Bergh Christina, Weder Maya, Buttarelli Marco, Isikoglu Mete, Balaban Basak, Baranowski Richard, Gryshchenko Mykola, Wyns C1ORCID, De Geyter C2ORCID, Calhaz-Jorge C3, Kupka M S4, Motrenko T5, Smeenk J6, Bergh C7, Tandler-Schneider A8, Rugescu I A9ORCID, Goossens V10ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels, Belgium 2. Reproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology (RME), University Hospital, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland 3. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa , Lisbon, Portugal 4. Fertility Center—Gynaekologicum , Hamburg, Germany 5. Human Reproduction Center Budva , Budva, Montenegro 6. Elisabeth Twee Steden Ziekenhuis , Tilburg, The Netherlands 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Göteborg University , Göteborg, Sweden 8. Fertility Center Berlin , Berlin, Germany 9. National Transplant Agency , Bucharest, Romania 10. ESHRE Central Office , Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
What are the data and trends on ART and IUI cycle numbers and their outcomes, and on fertility preservation (FP) interventions, reported in 2018 as compared to previous years?
SUMMARY ANSWER
The 22nd ESHRE report shows a continued increase in reported numbers of ART treatment cycles and children born in Europe, a decrease in transfers with more than one embryo with a further reduction of twin delivery rates (DRs) as compared to 2017, higher DRs per transfer after fresh IVF or ICSI cycles (without considering freeze-all cycles) than after frozen embryo transfer (FET) with higher pregnancy rates (PRs) after FET and the number of reported IUI cycles decreased while their PR and DR remained stable.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
ART aggregated data generated by national registries, clinics or professional societies have been gathered and analysed by the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) since 1997 and reported in 21 manuscripts published in Human Reproduction and Human Reproduction Open.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
Data on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) from European countries are collected by EIM for ESHRE on a yearly basis. The data on treatment cycles performed between 1 January and 31 December 2018 were provided by either national registries or registries based on initiatives of medical associations and scientific organizations or committed persons of 39 countries.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Overall, 1422 clinics offering ART services in 39 countries reported a total of more than 1 million (1 007 598) treatment cycles for the first time, including 162 837 with IVF, 400 375 with ICSI, 309 475 with FET, 48 294 with preimplantation genetic testing, 80 641 with egg donation (ED), 532 with IVM of oocytes and 5444 cycles with frozen oocyte replacement (FOR). A total of 1271 institutions reported data on IUI cycles using either husband/partner’s semen (IUI-H; n = 148 143) or donor semen (IUI-D; n = 50 609) in 31 countries and 25 countries, respectively. Sixteen countries reported 20 994 interventions in pre- and post-pubertal patients for FP including oocyte, ovarian tissue, semen and testicular tissue banking.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
In 21 countries (21 in 2017) in which all ART clinics reported to the registry, 410 190 treatment cycles were registered for a total population of ∼ 300 million inhabitants, allowing a best estimate of a mean of 1433 cycles performed per million inhabitants (range: 641–3549). Among the 39 reporting countries, for IVF, the clinical PR per aspiration slightly decreased while the PR per transfer remained similar compared to 2017 (25.5% and 34.1% in 2018 versus 26.8% and 34.3% in 2017). In ICSI, the corresponding rates showed similar evolutions in 2018 compared to 2017 (22.5% and 32.1% in 2018 versus 24.0% and 33.5% in 2017). When freeze-all cycles were not considered for the calculations, the clinical PRs per aspiration were 28.8% (29.4% in 2017) and 27.3% (27.3% in 2017) for IVF and ICSI, respectively. After FET with embryos originating from own eggs, the PR per thawing was 33.4% (versus 30.2% in 2017), and with embryos originating from donated eggs 41.8% (41.1% in 2017). After ED, the PR per fresh embryo transfer was 49.6% (49.2% in 2017) and per FOR 44.9% (43.3% in 2017). In IVF and ICSI together, the trend towards the transfer of fewer embryos continues with the transfer of 1, 2, 3 and ≥4 embryos in 50.7%, 45.1%, 3.9% and 0.3% of all treatments, respectively (corresponding to 46.0%, 49.2%. 4.5% and 0.3% in 2017). This resulted in a reduced proportion of twin DRs of 12.4% (14.2% in 2017) and similar triplet DR of 0.2%. Treatments with FET in 2018 resulted in twin and triplet DRs of 9.4% and 0.1%, respectively (versus 11.2% and 0.2%, respectively in 2017). After IUI, the DRs remained similar at 8.8% after IUI-H (8.7% in 2017) and at 12.6% after IUI-D (12.4% in 2017). Twin and triplet DRs after IUI-H were 8.4% and 0.3%, respectively (in 2017: 8.1% and 0.3%), and 6.4% and 0.2% after IUI-D (in 2017: 6.9% and 0.2%). Among 20 994 FP interventions in 16 countries (18 888 in 13 countries in 2017), cryopreservation of ejaculated sperm (n = 10 503, versus 11 112 in 2017) and of oocytes (n = 9123 versus 6588 in 2017) were the most frequently reported.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
The results should be interpreted with caution as data collection systems and completeness of reporting vary among European countries. Some countries were unable to deliver data about the number of initiated cycles and/or deliveries.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
The 22nd ESHRE data collection on ART, IUI and FP interventions shows a continuous increase of reported treatment numbers and MAR-derived livebirths in Europe. Although it is the largest data collection on MAR in Europe, further efforts towards optimization of both the collection and reporting, with the aim of improving surveillance and vigilance in the field of reproductive medicine, are awaited.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
The study has received no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering
Cited by
142 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|