The impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization on the reproductive outcomes of couples with non-male factor infertility and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization on the reproductive outcomes of couples with non-male factor infertility and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Published:2024-09-03 Issue:1 Volume:14 Page:
ISSN:2045-2322
Container-title:Scientific Reports
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci Rep

Author:

Zhang Yuchao,Zhang Wen,Liu Yanli,Ren Bingnan,Guan Yichun

Funder

Joint Construction Project of Henan Medical Science and Technology Research Plan

National Key R&D Program "Fertility Health and Health Security for Women and Children"

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-71744-1.pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Technology, A. S. F. R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 114(2), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.032 (2020).

2. Boulet, S. L. et al. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA 313(3), 255. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17985 (2015).

3. De Geyter, C. et al. ART in Europe, 2014: Results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring consortium (EIM) for the European society of human reproduction and embryology (ESHRE). Hum. Reprod. 33(9), 1586–1601. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey242 (2018).

4. Xiao-dong, Z. et al. Annual report on assisted reproductive technology of Chinese society of reproductive medicine in 2019. J. Reprod. Med. 31(8), 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2022.08.001 (2022).

5. Davies, M. J. et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(19), 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008095 (2012).