Large-scale supplemental feeding alters lay date and nest survival in Eastern Bluebirds but not in two species of chickadees

Author:

Bailey Robyn L1ORCID,Bonter David N1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cornell University, Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA

Abstract

Abstract Wild bird feeding is a popular and growing activity, with approximately half of households participating in nations including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia. Supplemental feeding can increase survival and reproductive success of birds (which is often a goal of supplemental feeding efforts), but it raises concerns about phenological mismatch and possible increased risk of nest predation. Our objectives were to test whether access to supplemental food during the breeding season was correlated with (1) advanced egg-laying phenology, (2) increased clutch size, or (3) improved nest survival of 3 cavity-nesting species (Carolina Chickadee [Poecile carolinensis], Black-capped Chickadee [P. atricapillus], and Eastern Bluebird [Sialia sialis]) at a large spatial scale (the United States and Canada; spanning 22° latitude and 55° longitude). We examined data from 24,528 nest attempts submitted to NestWatch from 2014 to 2019. For Eastern Bluebirds, birds with access to supplemental insects initiated clutches 5.83 ± 0.89 (mean ± SE) days earlier than birds without access to food subsidies, whereas predicted nest survival was 5% greater for birds with access to supplemental insects (probability of nest success = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77–0.81) than for birds without (0.74, 95% CI: 0.72–0.75). Clutch size of Eastern Bluebirds did not differ between birds with and without access to supplemental insects. For chickadees, supplemental feeding (of seeds, suet, insects, or fruit) was not correlated with phenology, clutch size, or nest survival. Our results suggest that supplemental feeding of insects can be an effective tool for increasing nest survival in Eastern Bluebirds and potentially other food-limited insectivores. However, the efficacy of supplemental feeding for improving reproductive success varies across taxa, likely related to diet. Despite widespread feeding of Black-capped and Carolina Chickadees, supplemental food had no discernable effect on timing of egg-laying, clutch size, or nest survival.

Funder

Cornell Lab of Ornithology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3