Toward Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review on Practical Approaches

Author:

Lukkien Dirk R M12,Nap Henk Herman13,Buimer Hendrik P1,Peine Alexander2,Boon Wouter P C2ORCID,Ket Johannes C F4,Minkman Mirella M N15,Moors Ellen H M2

Affiliation:

1. Vilans Centre of Expertise for Long-Term Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands

2. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

3. Human Technology Interaction, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

4. Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5. TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely positioned to become a key element of intelligent technologies used in the long-term care (LTC) for older adults. The increasing relevance and adoption of AI has encouraged debate over the societal and ethical implications of introducing and scaling AI. This scoping review investigates how the design and implementation of AI technologies in LTC is addressed responsibly: so-called responsible innovation (RI). Research Design and Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in 5 electronic databases using concepts related to LTC, AI, and RI. We then performed a descriptive and thematic analysis to map the key concepts, types of evidence, and gaps in the literature. Results After reviewing 3,339 papers, 25 papers were identified that met our inclusion criteria. From this literature, we extracted 3 overarching themes: user-oriented AI innovation; framing AI as a solution to RI issues; and context-sensitivity. Our results provide an overview of measures taken and recommendations provided to address responsible AI innovation in LTC. Discussion and Implications The review underlines the importance of the context of use when addressing responsible AI innovation in LTC. However, limited empirical evidence actually details how responsible AI innovation is addressed in context. Therefore, we recommend expanding empirical studies on RI at the level of specific AI technologies and their local contexts of use. Also, we call for more specific frameworks for responsible AI innovation in LTC to flexibly guide researchers and innovators. Future frameworks should clearly distinguish between RI processes and outcomes.

Funder

Vilans Centre of Expertise for Long-Term Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference84 articles.

1. Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches;Aamodt;AI Communications,1994

2. A prima facie duty approach to machine ethics and its application to elder care;Anderson,2011,

3. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework;Arksey;International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice,2005

4. Using an autonomous robot to maintain privacy in assistive environments;Armbrust;Security and Communication Networks,2011

5. Embedding ethics in the design of culturally competent socially assistive robots;Battistuzzi,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3