The security mindset: characteristics, development, and consequences

Author:

Schoenmakers Koen1,Greene Daniel2ORCID,Stutterheim Sarah3,Lin Herbert4,Palmer Megan J5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Harvard University , Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA

2. Gryphon Scientific LLC, 6930 Carroll Ave., Takoma Park MD 20912, and Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305 , USA

3. Care and Public Health Research Institute & Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University , 6200 MD, Maastricht , the Netherlands

4. Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305 , USA

5. Department of Bioengineering and Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305 , USA

Abstract

Abstract The world is facing a cybersecurity skills gap as cybercrime and cyberwarfare grow in importance. One often-discussed quality that is potentially relevant to cybersecurity recruitment and education is the so-called “security mindset”: a way of thinking characteristic of some security professionals that they believe to be especially advantageous in their work. Although some employers express a desire to hire people with a security mindset, and initiatives to cultivate the security mindset are being implemented, it has no common definition and little is known about its characteristics, its development, and its consequences. We interviewed 21 cybersecurity professionals who strongly identified as having a security mindset based on a minimal description drawn from existing literature. Thematic analysis of the interview data suggests that the security mindset can be conceptualized as consisting of three interconnected aspects—“monitoring” for potential security anomalies, “investigating” anomalies more deeply to identify security flaws, and “evaluating” the relevance of those flaws in a larger context. These three aspects develop in different ways and have different personal and professional consequences. Participants mostly spoke positively of the security mindset, but they also mentioned several disadvantages not mentioned by existing security-mindset literature, such as mental health pressures, workplace tensions, and negative effects on personal relationships. We discuss the implications of these findings for future study of the security mindset and suggest practical implications for cybersecurity management, education, and recruitment.

Funder

Open Philanthropy

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Computer Networks and Communications,Political Science and International Relations,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Social Psychology,Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference90 articles.

1. The security mindset – Schneier on security;Schneier,2008

2. The cybersecurity skills gap;Naden,2021

3. Closing the cybersecurity skills gap;Vogel;Salus Journal,2016

4. The real-world impact of the global cybersecurity workforce gap on cyber defenders;Rosso,2021

5. Cybersecurity Jobs Report 2018–2021;Morgan,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3