Objective functions for information-theoretical monitoring network design: what is “optimal”?
-
Published:2021-02-19
Issue:2
Volume:25
Page:831-850
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Foroozand Hossein, Weijs Steven V.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. This paper concerns the problem of optimal monitoring network layout using information-theoretical methods. Numerous different objectives
based on information measures have been proposed in recent literature,
often focusing simultaneously on maximum information and minimum
dependence between the chosen locations for data collection stations. We discuss
these objective functions and conclude that a single-objective optimization of joint entropy suffices to maximize the collection of information for a given number of stations. We argue that the widespread notion of minimizing redundancy, or dependence between monitored signals, as a secondary objective is not desirable and has no intrinsic justification. The negative effect of redundancy on total collected information is already accounted for in joint entropy, which measures total information net of any redundancies. In fact, for two networks of equal joint entropy, the one with a higher amount of redundant information should be preferred for reasons of robustness against failure.
In attaining the maximum joint entropy objective, we investigate exhaustive optimization, a more computationally tractable greedy approach that adds one station at a time, and we introduce the “greedy drop” approach, where the full set of stations is reduced one at a time. We show that no greedy approach can exist that is guaranteed to reach the global optimum.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Alfonso, L., Lobbrecht, A., and Price, R.: Information theory–based approach
for location of monitoring water level gauges in polders, Water Resour. Res., 46, W03528, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008101, 2010a. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i 2. Alfonso, L., Lobbrecht, A., and Price, R.: Optimization of water level
monitoring network in polder systems using information theory, Water Resour. Res., 46, W12553,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008953, 2010b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h 3. Aydin, B. E., Hagedooren, H., Rutten, M. M., Delsman, J.,
Oude Essink, G. H. P., van de Giesen, N., and Abraham, E.: A Greedy Algorithm
for Optimal Sensor Placement to Estimate Salinity in Polder Networks, Water,
11, 1101, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051101 2019. a 4. Banik, B. K., Alfonso, L., Di Cristo, C., and Leopardi, A.: Greedy Algorithms
for Sensor Location in Sewer Systems, Water, 9, 856,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110856 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n 5. Barrenetxea, G., Ingelrest, F., Schaefer, G., and Vetterli, M.: The
hitchhiker's guide to successful wireless sensor network deployments, in:
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems, SenSys '08, 43–56, Association for Computing Machinery, Raleigh, NC,
USA, https://doi.org/10.1145/1460412.1460418, 2008. a
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|