Re-evaluating safety risks of multifunctional dikes with a probabilistic risk framework
-
Published:2019-04-10
Issue:4
Volume:19
Page:737-756
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Marijnissen RichardORCID, Kok Matthijs, Kroeze Carolien, van Loon-Steensma Jantsje
Abstract
Abstract. It is not uncommon for a flood defence to be combined
with other societal uses as a multifunctional flood defence, from housing in
urban areas to nature conservation in rural areas. The assessment of the
safety of multifunctional flood defences is often done using conservative
estimates. This study synthesizes new probabilistic approaches to evaluate
the safety of multifunctional flood defences employed in the Netherlands and
explores the results of these approaches. In this paper a case representing
a typical Dutch river dike combining a flood safety function with a nature
and housing function is assessed by its probability of failure for multiple
reinforcement strategies considering multiple relevant failure mechanisms.
Results show how the conservative estimates of multifunctional flood
defences lead to a systematic underestimation of the reliability of these
dikes. Furthermore, in a probabilistic assessment uncertainties introduced
by multifunctional elements affect the level of safety of the dike
proportional to the reliability of the dike itself. Hence, dikes with higher
protection levels are more suitable to be combined with potentially harmful
uses for safety, whereas dikes with low protection levels can benefit most
from uses that contribute to safety.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference77 articles.
1. Aguilar-López, J. P., Warmink, J. J., Schielen, R. M. J., and Hulscher,
S. J. M. H.: Correlation Effect in Probabilistic Design against Piping in
Multi-Functional Flood Defences, in: Geotechnical Safety and Risk V, edited
by: Schweckendiek, T., Van Tol, A. F., Pereboom, D., Van Staveren, A., and
Cools, P. M. C. B. M., IOS Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,
https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-580-7-237, 2015. 2. Aguilar-López, J. P., Warmink, J. J., Schielen, R. M. J., and Hulscher,
S. J. M. H.: Piping erosion safety assessment of flood defences founded over
sewer pipes, Eur. J. Environ. Civ. En., 22, 707–735,
https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1217793, 2018. 3. Anvarifar, F., Oderkerk, M., van der Horst, B. R., and Zevenbergen, C.:
Cost-effectiveness study on preventive interventions: A survey of
multifunctional flood defences, in: Comprehensive Flood Risk Management:
research for policy and practice, edited by: Klijn, F. and Schweckendiek,
T., CRC Press, London, UK, 891–899, 2013. 4. Anvarifar, F., Zevenbergen, C., Thissen, W., and Islam, T.: Understanding
flexibility for multifunctional flood defences: a conceptual framework, J.
Water Clim. Change, 7, 467–484, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2016.064, 2016. 5. Anvarifar, F., Voorendt, M., Zevenbergen, C., and Thissen, W.: An application
of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to risk analysis of
multifunctional flood defences in the Netherlands, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe.,
158, 130–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.004, 2017.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|