Extremeness of recent drought events in Switzerland: dependence on variable and return period choice
-
Published:2019-10-23
Issue:10
Volume:19
Page:2311-2323
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Brunner Manuela I.ORCID, Liechti Katharina, Zappa MassimilianoORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The 2018 drought event had severe ecological, economic, and social impacts. How extreme was it in Switzerland? We addressed this question by looking at different types of drought, including meteorological, hydrological, agricultural, and groundwater drought, and at the two characteristics deficit and deficit duration. The analysis consisted of three main steps: (1) event identification using a threshold-level approach, (2) drought frequency analysis, and (3) comparison of the 2018 event to the severe 2003 and 2015 events. In Step 2 the variables precipitation, discharge, soil moisture, and low-flow storage were first considered separately in a univariate frequency analysis; pairs of variables were then investigated jointly in a bivariate frequency analysis using a copula model for expressing the dependence between the two variables under consideration. Our results show that the 2018 event was especially severe in north-eastern Switzerland in terms of soil moisture, with return periods locally exceeding 100 years. Slightly longer return periods were estimated when discharge and soil moisture deficits were considered together. The return period estimates depended on the region, variable, and return period considered. A single answer to the question of how extreme the 2018 drought event was in Switzerland is therefore not possible – rather, it depends on the processes one is interested in.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference51 articles.
1. Bachmair, S., Svensson, C., Hannaford, J., Barker, L. J., and Stahl, K.: A quantitative analysis to objectively appraise drought indicators and model drought impacts, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2589–2609, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2589-2016, 2016. a 2. Brunner, M. I., Seibert, J., and Favre, A.-C.: Bivariate return periods and
their importance for flood peak and volume estimation, Wire's Water, 3,
819–833, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1173, 2016. a, b 3. Brunner, M. I., Furrer, R., Sikorska, A. E., Viviroli, D., Seibert, J., and
Favre, A.-C.: Synthetic design hydrographs for ungauged catchments: A
comparison of regionalization methods, Stoch. Env. Res.
Risk A., 32, 1993–2023,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1523-3, 2018a. a, b 4. Brunner, M. I., Sikorska, A. E., Furrer, R., and Favre, A.-C.: Uncertainty
assessment of synthetic design hydrographs for gauged and ungauged
catchments, Water Resour. Res., 54, 1493–1512,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021129, 2018b. a, b 5. Brunner, M. I., Björnsen Gurung, A., Zappa, M., Zekollari, H., Farinotti,
D., and Stähli, M.: Present and future water scarcity in Switzerland:
Potential for alleviation through reservoirs and lakes, Sci. Total
Environ., 666, 1033–1047,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.169, 2019a. a
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|