Improved aerosol correction for OMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval over East Asia: constraint from CALIOP aerosol vertical profile
-
Published:2019-01-02
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:1-21
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Liu MengyaoORCID, Lin JintaiORCID, Boersma K. FolkertORCID, Pinardi GaiaORCID, Wang YangORCID, Chimot JulienORCID, Wagner Thomas, Xie Pinhua, Eskes HenkORCID, Van Roozendael Michel, Hendrick François, Wang Pucai, Wang Ting, Yan YingyingORCID, Chen LuluORCID, Ni Ruijing
Abstract
Abstract. Satellite retrieval of vertical column densities (VCDs) of tropospheric
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is critical for NOx pollution and impact
evaluation. For regions with high aerosol loadings, the retrieval accuracy is
greatly affected by whether aerosol optical effects are treated implicitly
(as additional “effective” clouds) or explicitly, among other factors. Our
previous POMINO algorithm explicitly accounts for aerosol effects to improve
the retrieval, especially in polluted situations over China, by using aerosol
information from GEOS-Chem simulations with further monthly constraints by
MODIS/Aqua aerosol optical depth (AOD) data. Here we present a major
algorithm update, POMINO v1.1, by constructing a monthly climatological dataset of aerosol extinction profiles, based on level 2 CALIOP/CALIPSO data over
2007–2015, to better constrain the modeled aerosol vertical profiles. We find that GEOS-Chem captures the month-to-month variation in CALIOP
aerosol layer height (ALH) but with a systematic underestimate by about 300–600 m
(season and location dependent), due to a too strong negative vertical
gradient of extinction above 1 km. Correcting the model aerosol extinction
profiles results in small changes in retrieved cloud fraction, increases in
cloud-top pressure (within 2 %–6 % in most cases), and increases in
tropospheric NO2 VCD by 4 %–16 % over China on a monthly basis in
2012. The improved NO2 VCDs (in POMINO v1.1) are more consistent with
independent ground-based MAX-DOAS observations (R2=0.80, NMB = −3.4 %, for
162 pixels in 49 days) than POMINO (R2=0.80, NMB = −9.6 %), DOMINO v2 (R2=0.68, NMB = −2.1 %), and QA4ECV
(R2=0.75, NMB = −22.0 %) are. Especially on haze days, R2
reaches 0.76 for POMINO v1.1, much higher than that for POMINO (0.68),
DOMINO v2 (0.38), and QA4ECV (0.34). Furthermore, the increase in cloud
pressure likely reveals a more realistic vertical relationship between cloud
and aerosol layers, with aerosols situated above the clouds in certain
months instead of always below the clouds. The POMINO v1.1 algorithm is a
core step towards our next public release of the data product (POMINO v2), and
it will also be applied to the recently launched S5P-TROPOMI sensor.
Funder
European Commission National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference77 articles.
1. Acarreta, J. R., De Haan, J. F., and Stammes, P.: Cloud pressure retrieval
using the O2-O2 absorption band at 477 nm, J. Geophys. Res.,
109, D05204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003915, 2004. 2. ACM group at Peking University: POMINO v2 NO2 Level-2 and Level-3 data,
available at:
https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/share/zyC4mNEyRfRk0IX114sR51lWTMpcP1d4SwLVrW55iFG/folder/S7IR7WSLSPikdLT_jsNX8g?_encoding=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0&mgh=1,
last access: 20 December 2018. 3. Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Tsekeri, A., Wandinger, U., Schwarz, A.,
Giannakaki, E., Mamouri, R., Kokkalis, P., Binietoglou, I., Solomos, S.,
Herekakis, T., Kazadzis, S., Gerasopoulos, E., Proestakis, E., Kottas, M.,
Balis, D., Papayannis, A., Kontoes, C., Kourtidis, K., Papagiannopoulos, N.,
Mona, L., Pappalardo, G., Le Rille, O., and Ansmann, A.: LIVAS: a 3-D
multi-wavelength aerosol/cloud database based on CALIPSO and EARLINET, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 7127–7153, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7127-2015, 2015. 4. Belmonte Rivas, M., Veefkind, P., Boersma, F., Levelt, P., Eskes, H., and
Gille, J.: Intercomparison of daytime stratospheric NO2 satellite retrievals
and model simulations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2203–2225,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2203-2014, 2014. 5. Boersma, K. F., Bucsela, E. J., Brinksma, E. J., and Gleason, J. F.:
NO2, in: OMI Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, vol. 4, OMI Trace
Gas Algorithms, ATB-OMI-04, Version 2.0, edited by: Chance, K., NASA Distrib.
Active Archive Cent., Greenbelt, Md., August, 13–36, 2002.
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|