A new methodology for PBL height estimations based on lidar depolarization measurements: analysis and comparison against MWR and WRF model-based results
-
Published:2017-06-12
Issue:11
Volume:17
Page:6839-6851
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Bravo-Aranda Juan AntonioORCID, de Arruda Moreira Gregori, Navas-Guzmán FranciscoORCID, Granados-Muñoz María José, Guerrero-Rascado Juan Luis, Pozo-Vázquez David, Arbizu-Barrena Clara, Olmo Reyes Francisco José, Mallet Marc, Alados Arboledas LucasORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The automatic and non-supervised detection of the planetary boundary layer height (zPBL) by means of lidar measurements was widely investigated during the last several years. Despite considerable advances, the experimental detection still presents difficulties such as advected aerosol layers coupled to the planetary boundary layer (PBL) which usually produces an overestimation of the zPBL. To improve the detection of the zPBL in these complex atmospheric situations, we present a new algorithm, called POLARIS (PBL height estimation based on lidar depolarisation). POLARIS applies the wavelet covariance transform (WCT) to the range-corrected signal (RCS) and to the perpendicular-to-parallel signal ratio (δ) profiles. Different candidates for zPBL are chosen and the selection is done based on the WCT applied to the RCS and δ. We use two ChArMEx (Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean Experiment) campaigns with lidar and microwave radiometer (MWR) measurements, conducted in 2012 and 2013, for the POLARIS' adjustment and validation. POLARIS improves the zPBL detection compared to previous methods based on lidar measurements, especially when an aerosol layer is coupled to the PBL. We also compare the zPBL provided by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) numerical weather prediction (NWP) model with respect to the zPBL determined with POLARIS and the MWR under Saharan dust events. WRF underestimates the zPBL during daytime but agrees with the MWR during night-time. The zPBL provided by WRF shows a better temporal evolution compared to the MWR during daytime than during night-time.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Angelini, F., Barnaba, F., Landi, T. C., Caporaso, L., and Gobbi, G. P.: Study of atmospheric aerosols and mixing layer by lidar, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 137, 275–279, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncp219, 2009. 2. Arbizu-Barrena, C., Pozo-Vázquez, D., Ruiz-Arias, J. A., and Tovar-Pescador, J.: Macroscopic cloud properties in the WRF NWP model: An assessment using sky camera and ceilometer data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10297–10312, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023502, 2015. 3. Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7281–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7281-2008, 2008. 4. Banks, R. F. and Baldasano, J. M.: Impact of WRF model PBL schemes on air quality simulations over Catalonia, Spain, Sci. Total Environ., 572, 98–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.167, 2016. 5. Banks, R. F., Tiana-Alsina, J., Rocadenbosch, F., and Baldasano, J. M.: Performance evaluation of the boundary-Layer height from lidar and the Weather Research and Forecasting model at an urban coastal site in the North-East Iberian Peninsula, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 157, 265–292, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0056-2, 2015.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|