Potential of 14C-based vs. ΔCO-based ΔffCO2 observations to estimate urban fossil fuel CO2 (ffCO2) emissions

Author:

Maier FabianORCID,Rödenbeck ChristianORCID,Levin IngeborgORCID,Gerbig ChristophORCID,Gachkivskyi Maksym,Hammer Samuel

Abstract

Abstract. Atmospheric transport inversions are a powerful tool for independently estimating surface CO2 fluxes from atmospheric CO2 concentration measurements. However, additional tracers are needed to separate the fossil fuel CO2 (ffCO2) emissions from non-fossil CO2 fluxes. In this study, we focus on radiocarbon (14C), the most direct tracer of ffCO2, and the continuously measured surrogate tracer carbon monoxide (CO), which is co-emitted with ffCO2 during incomplete combustion. In the companion paper by Maier et al. (2024), we determined discrete 14C-based and continuous ΔCO-based estimates of the ffCO2 excess concentration (ΔffCO2) compared with a clean-air reference for the urban Heidelberg observation site in southwestern Germany. The ΔCO-based ΔffCO2 concentration was calculated by dividing the continuously measured ΔCO excess concentration by an average 14C-basedΔCO/ΔffCO2 ratio. Here, we use the CarboScope inversion framework adapted for the urban domain around Heidelberg to assess the potential of both types of ΔffCO2 observations to investigate ffCO2 emissions and their seasonal cycle. We find that, although they are more precise, 14C-based ΔffCO2 observations from almost 100 afternoon flask samples collected in the 2 years of 2019 and 2020 are not well suited for estimating robust ffCO2 emissions in the main footprint of this urban area, which has a very heterogeneous distribution of sources including several point sources. The benefit of the continuous ΔCO-based ΔffCO2 estimates is that they can be averaged to reduce the impact of individual hours with an inadequate model performance. We show that the weekly averaged ΔCO-based ΔffCO2 observations allow for a robust reconstruction of the seasonal cycle of the area source ffCO2 emissions from temporally flat a priori emissions. In particular, the distinct COVID-19 signal – with a steep drop in emissions in spring 2020 – is clearly present in these data-driven a posteriori results. Moreover, our top-down results show a shift in the seasonality of the area source ffCO2 emissions around Heidelberg in 2019 compared with the bottom-up estimates from the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO). This highlights the huge potential of ΔCO-based ΔffCO2 to validate bottom-up ffCO2 emissions at urban stations if the ΔCO/ΔffCO2 ratios can be determined without biases.

Funder

Horizon 2020

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Reference47 articles.

1. Andres, R. J., Boden, T. A., Bréon, F.-M., Ciais, P., Davis, S., Erickson, D., Gregg, J. S., Jacobson, A., Marland, G., Miller, J., Oda, T., Olivier, J. G. J., Raupach, M. R., Rayner, P., and Treanton, K.: A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion, Biogeosciences, 9, 1845–1871, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1845-2012, 2012.

2. Basu, S., Miller, J. B., and Lehman, S.: Separation of biospheric and fossil fuel fluxes of CO2 by atmospheric inversion of CO2 and 14CO2 measurements: Observation System Simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5665–5683, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5665-2016, 2016.

3. Basu, S., Lehman, S. J., Miller, J. B., Andrews, A. E., Sweeney, C., Gurney, K. R., Xue, X., Southon, J., and Tans, P. P.: Estimating US fossil fuel CO2 emissions from measurements of 14C in atmospheric CO2, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 13300–13307, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919032117, 2020.

4. Bergamaschi, P., Danila, A., Weiss, R. F., Ciais, P., Thompson, R. L., Brunner, D., Levin, I., Meijer, Y., Chevallier, F., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Bovensmann, H., Crisp, D., Basu, S., Dlugokencky, E., Engelen, R., Gerbig, C., Günther, D., Hammer, S., Henne, S., Houweling, S., Karstens, U., Kort, E., Maione, M., Manning, A. J., Miller, J., Montzka, S., Pandey, S., Peters, W., Peylin, P., Pinty, B., Ramonet, M., Reimann, S., Röckmann, T., Schmidt, M., Strogies, M., Sussams, J., Tarasova, O., van Aardenne, J., Vermeulen, A. T., and Vogel, F.: Atmospheric monitoring and inverse modelling for verification of greenhouse gas inventories, EUR 29276 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, JRC111789, https://doi.org/10.2760/759928, ISBN 978-92-79-88938-7, 2018.

5. Boschetti, F., Thouret, V., Maenhout, G. J., Totsche, K. U., Marshall, J., and Gerbig, C.: Multi-species inversion and IAGOS airborne data for a better constraint of continental-scale fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9225–9241, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9225-2018, 2018.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3