Defining and resolving current systems in geospace
-
Published:2015-11-10
Issue:11
Volume:33
Page:1369-1402
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Ganushkina N. Y., Liemohn M. W.ORCID, Dubyagin S., Daglis I. A.ORCID, Dandouras I.ORCID, De Zeeuw D. L., Ebihara Y.ORCID, Ilie R., Katus R., Kubyshkina M., Milan S. E., Ohtani S., Ostgaard N., Reistad J. P.ORCID, Tenfjord P.ORCID, Toffoletto F., Zaharia S., Amariutei O.
Abstract
Abstract. Electric currents flowing through near-Earth space (R ≤ 12 RE) can support a highly distorted magnetic field topology, changing particle drift paths and therefore having a nonlinear feedback on the currents themselves. A number of current systems exist in the magnetosphere, most commonly defined as (1) the dayside magnetopause Chapman–Ferraro currents, (2) the Birkeland field-aligned currents with high-latitude "region 1" and lower-latitude "region 2" currents connected to the partial ring current, (3) the magnetotail currents, and (4) the symmetric ring current. In the near-Earth nightside region, however, several of these current systems flow in close proximity to each other. Moreover, the existence of other temporal current systems, such as the substorm current wedge or "banana" current, has been reported. It is very difficult to identify a local measurement as belonging to a specific system. Such identification is important, however, because how the current closes and how these loops change in space and time governs the magnetic topology of the magnetosphere and therefore controls the physical processes of geospace. Furthermore, many methods exist for identifying the regions of near-Earth space carrying each type of current. This study presents a robust collection of these definitions of current systems in geospace, particularly in the near-Earth nightside magnetosphere, as viewed from a variety of observational and computational analysis techniques. The influence of definitional choice on the resulting interpretation of physical processes governing geospace dynamics is presented and discussed.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference290 articles.
1. Akasofu, S.-I. and Chapman, S.: The Ring Current, Geomagnetic Disturbance, and the Van Allen Radiation Belts, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 1321–1350, 1961. 2. Akasofu, S.-I. and Chapman, S.: On the asymmetric development of magnetic storm fields in low and middle, Planet. Space Sci., 12, 607–626, 1964. 3. Akasofu, S.-I. and Meng, C.-I.: A study of polar magnetic substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 293–313, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA074i001p00293, 1969. 4. Alexeev, I. I., Belenkaya, E. S., Kalegaev, V. V., Feldstein, Y. I., and Grafe, A.: Magnetic storms and magnetotail currents, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7737–7747, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA03509, 1996. 5. Alfvén, H.: Discussion of the Origin of the Terrestrial and Solar Magnetic Fields, Tellus, 2, 74–82, 1950.
Cited by
73 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|