Quantification of isomer-resolved iodide chemical ionization mass spectrometry sensitivity and uncertainty using a voltage-scanning approach
-
Published:2021-10-25
Issue:10
Volume:14
Page:6835-6850
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Bi ChenyangORCID, Krechmer Jordan E.ORCID, Frazier Graham O.ORCID, Xu WenORCID, Lambe Andrew T., Claflin Megan S.ORCID, Lerner Brian M.ORCID, Jayne John T., Worsnop Douglas R., Canagaratna Manjula R., Isaacman-VanWertz GabrielORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) using iodide as a reagent ion has been widely used to classify organic compounds in the atmosphere by their
elemental formula. Unfortunately, calibration of these instruments is
challenging due to a lack of commercially available standards for many
compounds, which has led to the development of methods for estimating CIMS
sensitivity. By coupling a thermal desorption aerosol gas chromatograph (TAG) simultaneously to a flame ionization detector (FID) and an iodide CIMS, we use
the individual particle-phase analytes, quantified by the FID, to examine the
sensitivity of the CIMS and its variability between isomers of the same
elemental formula. Iodide CIMS sensitivities of isomers within a formula are
found to generally vary by 1 order of magnitude with a maximum deviation of 2 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, we compare directly measured sensitivity
to a method of estimating sensitivity based on declustering voltage (i.e.,
“voltage scanning”). This approach is found to carry high uncertainties for
individual analytes (0.5 to 1 order of magnitude) but represents a central tendency that can be used to estimate the sum of analytes with reasonable
error (∼30 % differences between predicted and measured
moles). Finally, gas chromatography (GC) retention time, which is associated with vapor pressure and chemical functionality of an analyte, is found to qualitatively correlate
with iodide CIMS sensitivity, but the relationship is not close enough to be
quantitatively useful and could be explored further in the future as a
potential calibration approach.
Funder
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference58 articles.
1. Aljawhary, D., Lee, A. K. Y., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: High-resolution chemical ionization mass spectrometry (ToF-CIMS): application to study SOA composition and processing, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3211–3224, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3211-2013, 2013. 2. Arangio, A. M., Tong, H., Socorro, J., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Quantification of environmentally persistent free radicals and reactive oxygen species in atmospheric aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13105–13119, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016, 2016. 3. Atkinson, R.: Atmospheric chemistry of vocs and nox, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2063–2101, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00460-4, 2000. 4. Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420, 2003. 5. Bertram, T. H., Kimmel, J. R., Crisp, T. A., Ryder, O. S., Yatavelli, R. L. N., Thornton, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Gonin, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: A field-deployable, chemical ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1471–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1471-2011, 2011.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|