Author:
Wen D.,Lin J. C.,Meng F.,Gbor P. K.,He Z.,Sloan J. J.
Abstract
Abstract. Hourly total gaseous mercury (TGM) concentrations at three monitoring sites (receptors) in Ontario were predicted for four selected periods at different seasons in 2002 using the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model, which transports Lagrangian air parcels backward in time from the receptors to provide linkages to the source region in the upwind area. The STILT model was modified to deal with Hg deposition and high stack Hg emissions. The model-predicted Hg concentrations were compared with observations at three monitoring sites. Estimates of transport errors (uncertainties in simulated concentrations due to errors in wind fields) are also provided that suggest such errors can reach approximately 10% of simulated concentrations. Results from a CMAQ chemical transport model (CTM) simulation in which the same emission and meteorology inputs were used are also reported. The comparisons show that STILT-predicted Hg concentrations usually agree better with observations than CMAQ except for a subset of cases that are subject to biases in the coarsely resolved boundary conditions. In these comparisons STILT captures high frequency concentration variations better than the Eulerian CTM, likely due to its ability to account for the sub-grid scale position of the receptor site and to minimize numerical diffusion. Thus it is particularly valuable for the interpretation of plumes (short-term concentration variations) that require the use of finer mesh sizes or controls on numerical diffusion in Eulerian models. We report quantitative assessments of the relative importance of different upstream sources for the selected episodes, based on emission fluxes and STILT footprints. The STILT simulations indicate that natural sources (which include re-emission from historical anthropogenic activities) contribute much more than current-day anthropogenic emissions to the Hg concentrations observed at the three sites.
Reference37 articles.
1. Briggs, G. A.: Some Recent Analyses of Plume Rise Observation. Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress, edited by: HM Englund and WT Berry, 1029–1032, 1971.
2. Briggs, G. A.: Discussion: Chimney plumes in neutral and stable surroundings, Atmos. Environ., 6, 507–510, 1972.
3. Bullock, O. R.: Current methods and research strategies for modeling atmospheric mercury, Fuel Proc. Technol., 65, 459–471, 2000.
4. Bullock, O. R. and Brehme, K. A.: Atmospheric mercury simulation using the CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2135–2146, 2002.
5. Cheng, M. D. and Schroeder, W. H.: Potential atmospheric transport pathways for mercury measured in the Canadian high arctic, J. Atmos. Chem., 35, 101–107, 2000.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献