Author:
Halverson M. J.,Fleming S. W.
Abstract
Abstract. Network theory is applied to an array of streamflow gauges located in the Coast Mountains of British Columbia (BC) and Yukon, Canada. The goal of the analysis is to assess whether insights from this branch of mathematical graph theory can be meaningfully applied to hydrometric data, and, more specifically, whether it may help guide decisions concerning stream gauge placement so that the full complexity of the regional hydrology is efficiently captured. The streamflow data, when represented as a complex network, have a global clustering coefficient and average shortest path length consistent with small-world networks, which are a class of stable and efficient networks common in nature, but the observed degree distribution did not clearly indicate a scale-free network. Stability helps ensure that the network is robust to the loss of nodes; in the context of a streamflow network, stability is interpreted as insensitivity to station removal at random. Community structure is also evident in the streamflow network. A network theoretic community detection algorithm identified separate communities, each of which appears to be defined by the combination of its median seasonal flow regime (pluvial, nival, hybrid, or glacial, which in this region in turn mainly reflects basin elevation) and geographic proximity to other communities (reflecting shared or different daily meteorological forcing). Furthermore, betweenness analyses suggest a handful of key stations which serve as bridges between communities and might be highly valued. We propose that an idealized sampling network should sample high-betweenness stations, small-membership communities which are by definition rare or undersampled relative to other communities, and index stations having large numbers of intracommunity links, while retaining some degree of redundancy to maintain network robustness.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference58 articles.
1. Abe, S. and Suzuki, N.: Small-world structure of earthquake network, Physica A, 337, 357–362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.01.059, 2004.
2. Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., and Stanley, H. E.: Classes of small-world networks, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 11149–11152, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200327197, 2000.
3. Archfield, S. A. and Kiang, J. E.: Response of the United States streamgauge network to high- and low-flow periods, abstract H41M-08 presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, USA, available at: http://abstractsearch.agu.org/meetings/2011/FM/sections/H/sessions/H41M/abstracts/H41M-08.html, last access: 12 December 2014, 2011.
4. Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286, 509–512, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509, 1999.
5. Bras, R. L. and Rodríguez-Iturbe, I.: Rainfall network design for runoff prediction, Water Resour. Res., 12, 1197–1208, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i006p01197, 1976.
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献