Use of field and laboratory methods for estimating unsaturated hydraulic properties under different land uses
-
Published:2015-03-03
Issue:3
Volume:19
Page:1193-1207
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Siltecho S., Hammecker C.ORCID, Sriboonlue V., Clermont-Dauphin C., Trelo-ges V., Antonino A. C. D., Angulo-Jaramillo R.
Abstract
Abstract. Adequate water management is required to improve the efficiency and sustainability of agricultural systems when water is scarce or over-abundant, especially in the case of land use changes. In order to quantify, to predict and eventually to control water and solute transport into soil, soil hydraulic properties need to be determined precisely. As their determination is often tedious, expensive and time-consuming, many alternative field and laboratory techniques are now available. The aim of this study was to determine unsaturated soil hydraulic properties under different land uses and to compare the results obtained with different measurement methods (Beerkan, disc infiltrometer, evaporation, pedotransfer function). The study has been realized on a tropical sandy soil in a mini-watershed in northeastern Thailand. The experimental plots were positioned in a rubber tree plantation in different positions along a slope, in ruzi grass pasture and in an original forest site. Non-parametric statistics demonstrated that van Genuchten unsaturated soil parameters (Ks, α and n) were significantly different according to the measurement methods employed, whereas the land use was not a significant discriminating factor when all methods were considered together. However, within each method, parameters n and α were statistically different according to the sites. These parameters were used with Hydrus1D for a 1-year simulation and computed pressure head did not show noticeable differences for the various sets of parameters, highlighting the fact that for modeling, any of these measurement methods could be employed. The choice of the measurement method would therefore be motivated by the simplicity, robustness and its low cost.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Ankeny, M. D., Ahmed, M., Kaspar, T. C., and Horton, R.: Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55, 467–470, 1991. 2. Anderson, J. L., and Bouma, J.: Relationships between hydraulic conductivity and morphometric data of an argillic horizon, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 37, 413–421, 1997. 3. Angulo Jaramillo, R., Vandervaere, J.-P., Roulier, S., Thony, J.-L., Gaudet, J.-P., and Vauclin, M.: Field measurement of soil surface hydraulic properties by disc and ring infiltrometers: a review and recent developments, Soil Till. Res., 55, 1–29, 2000. 4. Antonino, A. C. D., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Hammecker, C., Netto, A. M., Montenegro, S. M. L. G., Lira, C. A. B. O., and Cabral, J. J. S. P. A.: A simplified water transfer model of the reservoir-ebb tide system, including preferential flow, in the semi-arid region in Northeastern Brazil, J. Hydrol., 287, 147–160, 2004. 5. Anuraga, T., Ruiz, L., Kumar, M. M., Sekhar, M., and Leijnse, A.: Estimating groundwater recharge using land use and soil data: a case study in South India, Agr. Water Manage., 84, 65–76, 2006.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|