Sensitivity of GNSS tropospheric gradients to processing options
-
Published:2019-06-18
Issue:3
Volume:37
Page:429-446
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Kačmařík Michal, Douša JanORCID, Zus Florian, Václavovic Pavel, Balidakis KyriakosORCID, Dick Galina, Wickert Jens
Abstract
Abstract. An analysis of processing settings impacts on estimated
tropospheric gradients is presented. The study is based on the benchmark
data set collected within the COST GNSS4SWEC action with observations from
430 Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) reference stations in central Europe for May and June 2013.
Tropospheric gradients were estimated in eight different variants of GNSS
data processing using precise point positioning (PPP) with the G-Nut/Tefnut
software. The impacts of the gradient mapping function, elevation cut-off
angle, GNSS constellation, observation elevation-dependent weighting and
real-time versus post-processing mode were assessed by comparing the
variants by each to other and by evaluating them with respect to
tropospheric gradients derived from two numerical weather models (NWMs).
Tropospheric gradients estimated in post-processing GNSS solutions using
final products were in good agreement with NWM outputs. The quality of
high-resolution gradients estimated in (near-)real-time PPP analysis still
remains a challenging task due to the quality of the real-time orbit and clock
corrections. Comparisons of GNSS and NWM gradients suggest the 3∘
elevation angle cut-off and GPS+GLONASS constellation for obtaining
optimal gradient estimates provided precise models for antenna-phase centre
offsets and variations, and tropospheric mapping functions are applied for
low-elevation observations. Finally, systematic errors can affect the
gradient components solely due to the use of different gradient mapping
functions, and still depending on observation elevation-dependent weighting.
A latitudinal tilting of the troposphere in a global scale causes a
systematic difference of up to 0.3 mm in the north-gradient component, while
large local gradients, usually pointing in a direction of increasing
humidity, can cause differences of up to 1.0 mm (or even more in extreme cases)
in any component depending on the actual direction of the gradient. Although
the Bar-Sever gradient mapping function provided slightly better results in
some aspects, it is not possible to give any strong recommendation on the
gradient mapping function selection.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference43 articles.
1. Ahmed, F., Václavovic, P., Teferle, F. N., Douša, J., Bingley, R., and
Laurichesse, D.: Comparative analysis of real-time precise point positioning
zenith total delay estimates, GPS Solut., 20, 187,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0427-z, 2016. 2. Bar-Sever, Y. E., Kroger, P. M., and Borjesson, J. A.: Estimating horizontal
gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 5019–5035, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB03534, 1998. 3. Balidakis, K., Nilsson, T., Zus, F., Glaser, S., Heinkelmann, R., Deng, Z.,
and Schuh, H.: Estimating Integrated Water Vapor Trends From VLBI, GPS, and
Numerical Weather Models: Sensitivity to Tropospheric Parameterization,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6356–6372, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028049, 2018. 4. Bender, M., Dick, G., Ge, M., Deng, Z., Wickert, J., Kahle, H.-G., Raabe, A.,
and Tetzlaff, G.: Development of a GNSS water vapour tomography system using
algebraic reconstruction techniques, Adv. Space Res., 47,
1704–1720, 2011. 5. Bender, M., Stephan, K., Schraff, C., Reich, H., Rhodin, A., and Potthast,
R.: GPS Slant Delay Assimilation for Convective Scale NWP, Fifth
International Symposium on Data Assimilation (ISDA), 18–22 July 2016, University of Reading,
UK, 2016.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|