CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica
-
Published:2020-03-06
Issue:3
Volume:14
Page:855-879
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Barthel AliceORCID, Agosta CécileORCID, Little Christopher M., Hattermann Tore, Jourdain Nicolas C.ORCID, Goelzer HeikoORCID, Nowicki SophieORCID, Seroussi HeleneORCID, Straneo FiammettaORCID, Bracegirdle Thomas J.
Abstract
Abstract. The ice sheet model intercomparison project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6) effort brings together the ice sheet and climate modeling communities to gain understanding of the ice sheet contribution to sea level rise. ISMIP6 conducts stand-alone ice sheet experiments that use space- and time-varying forcing derived from atmosphere–ocean coupled global climate models (AOGCMs) to reflect plausible trajectories for climate projections. The goal of this study is to recommend a subset of CMIP5 AOGCMs (three core and three targeted) to produce forcing for ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet simulations, based on (i) their representation of current climate near Antarctica and Greenland relative to observations and (ii) their ability to sample a diversity of projected atmosphere and ocean changes over the 21st century. The selection is performed separately for Greenland and Antarctica. Model evaluation over the historical period focuses on variables used to generate ice sheet forcing. For stage (i), we combine metrics of atmosphere and surface ocean state (annual- and seasonal-mean variables over large spatial domains) with metrics of time-mean subsurface ocean temperature biases averaged over sectors of the continental shelf. For stage (ii), we maximize the diversity of climate projections among the best-performing models. Model selection is also constrained by technical limitations, such as availability of required data from RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 projections. The selected top three CMIP5 climate models are CCSM4, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, and NorESM1-M for Antarctica and HadGEM2-ES, MIROC5, and NorESM1-M for Greenland. This model selection was designed specifically for ISMIP6 but can be adapted for other applications.
Funder
Office of Science Agence Nationale de la Recherche Division of Polar Programs National Science Foundation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference72 articles.
1. Agosta, C., Fettweis, X., and Datta, R.: Evaluation of the CMIP5 models in the aim of regional modelling of the Antarctic surface mass balance, The Cryosphere, 9, 2311–2321, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2311-2015, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f, g 2. Agosta, C., Amory, C., Kittel, C., Orsi, A., Favier, V., Gallée, H., van den Broeke, M. R., Lenaerts, J. T. M., van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., and Fettweis, X.: Estimation of the Antarctic surface mass balance using the regional climate model MAR (1979–2015) and identification of dominant processes, The Cryosphere, 13, 281–296, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-281-2019, 2019. a 3. Andrews, L. C., Catania, G. A., Hoffman, M. J., Gulley, J. D., Lüthi, M. P.,
Ryser, C., Hawley, R. L., and Neumann, T. A.: Direct observations of
evolving subglacial drainage beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet, Nature, 514,
80, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13796, 2014. a 4. Asay-Davis, X. S., Jourdain, N. C., and Nakayama, Y.: Developments in
Simulating and Parameterizing Interactions Between the Southern Ocean and the
Antarctic Ice Sheet, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 3, 316–329,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0071-0, 2017. a 5. Banwell, A. F., MacAyeal, D. R., and Sergienko, O. V.: Breakup of the Larsen B
Ice Shelf triggered by chain reaction drainage of supraglacial lakes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5872–5876, 2013. a
Cited by
62 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|