Budget of nitrous acid (HONO) at an urban site in the fall season of Guangzhou, China
-
Published:2022-07-12
Issue:13
Volume:22
Page:8951-8971
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Yu Yihang, Cheng PengORCID, Li Huirong, Yang Wenda, Han Baobin, Song Wei, Hu WeiweiORCID, Wang XinmingORCID, Yuan BinORCID, Shao Min, Huang Zhijiong, Li Zhen, Zheng Junyu, Wang HaichaoORCID, Yu Xiaofang
Abstract
Abstract. High concentrations of nitrous acid (HONO) have been
observed in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region of China in recent years,
contributing to an elevated atmospheric oxidation capacity due to the production of OH
through HONO photolysis. We investigated the budget of HONO at an urban
site in Guangzhou from 27 September to 9 November 2018 using data from a
comprehensive atmospheric observation campaign. During this period, measured concentrations of HONO were
0.02 to 4.43 ppbv, with an average of 0.74 ± 0.70 ppbv.
An emission ratio (HONO/NOx) of 0.9 ± 0.4 % was derived from 11 fresh
plumes. The primary emission rate of HONO at night was calculated to be
between 0.04 ± 0.02 and 0.30 ± 0.15 ppbv h−1
based on a high-resolution NOx emission inventory. Heterogeneous conversion
of NO2 on the ground surface (0.27 ± 0.13 ppbv h−1), primary
emissions from vehicle exhaust (between 0.04 ± 0.02 and
0.30 ± 0.15 ppbv h−1, with a middle value of 0.16 ± 0.07 ppbv h−1), and the homogeneous reaction of NO + OH (0.14 ± 0.30 ppbv h−1) were found to be the three largest sources of HONO at night.
Heterogeneous NO2 conversion on aerosol surfaces (0.03 ± 0.02 ppbv h−1) and soil emission (0.019 ± 0.009 ppbv h−1) were two other minor sources. Correlation analysis shows that
NH3 and the relative humidity (RH) may have participated in the
heterogeneous transformation of NO2 to HONO at night. Dry deposition
(0.41 ± 0.31 ppbv h−1) was the main removal process of HONO at
night, followed by dilution (0.18 ± 0.16 ppbv h−1), while HONO
loss at aerosol surfaces was much slower (0.008 ± 0.006 ppbv h−1). In the daytime, the average primary emission Pemis was 0.12 ± 0.02 ppbv h−1, and the homogeneous reaction POH+NO was
0.79 ± 0.61 ppbv h−1, larger than the unknown source
PUnknown (0.65 ± 0.46 ppbv h−1). Similar to previous
studies, PUnknown appeared to be related to the photo-enhanced
conversion of NO2. Our results show that primary emissions and the reaction of NO + OH can
significantly affect HONO at a site with intensive emissions during both the
daytime and nighttime. Uncertainty in parameter values assumed in
the calculation of HONO sources can have a strong impact on the relative
importance of HONO sources at night, and could be reduced by improving
knowledge of key parameters such as the NO2 uptake coefficient. The
uncertainty in the estimated direct emission can be reduced by using emission
data with higher resolution and quality. Our study highlights the importance
of better constraining both conventional and novel HONO sources by reducing
uncertainties in their key parameters for advancing our knowledge of this
important source of atmospheric OH.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program of China Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholars Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference166 articles.
1. Acker, K., Spindler, G., and Brüggemann, E.: Nitrous and nitric acid
measurements during the INTERCOMP2000 campaign in Melpitz, Atmos.
Environ., 38, 6497–6505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.030, 2004. 2. Acker, K., Febo, A., Trick, S., Perrino, C., Bruno, P., Wiesen, P.,
Möller, D., Wieprecht, W., Auel, R., Giusto, M., Geyer, A., Platt, U.,
and Allegrini, I.: Nitrous acid in the urban area of Rome, Atmos.
Environ., 40, 3123–3133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.028, 2006. 3. Alicke, B., Geyer, A., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Konrad, S., Pätz,
H. W., Schäfer, J., Stutz, J., Volz-Thomas, A., and Platt, U.: OH
formation by HONO photolysis during the BERLIOZ experiment, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8247, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000579, 2003. 4. Ammann, M., Kalberer, M., Jost, D. T., Tobler, L., Rössler, E., Piguet,
D., Gäggeler, H. W., and Baltensperger, U.: Heterogeneous production of
nitrous acid on soot in polluted air masses, Nature, 395, 157–160,
https://doi.org/10.1038/25965, 1998. 5. Aubin, D. G. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Interaction of NO2 with Hydrocarbon
Soot: Focus on HONO Yield, Surface Modification, and Mechanism, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 111, 6263–6273, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp068884h, 2007.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|