Abstract
Abstract. Red deer (Cervus elaphus) hinds (n=3×10) of identical initial body
weight (BW, ca. 68 kg) were reared on a monocotyledonous grass (G group), on a
grass–papilionaceous (GP group) or on pure papilionaceous pasture each of 2 ha (P group) for
219 d. At the end of the experiment carcass tissue composition
was assessed by means of computer tomography, slaughter value and meat
quality were characterized and tissue – longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL), thigh and liver – samples were
taken for fatty acid composition analysis. The primary aim was to assess
nutrition-driven differences. Hinds of group P provided higher final BW (101 kg vs. 90 and 91.9 kg in groups G
and GP, respectively) and higher BW gain (32.6 kg during the total period vs. 22.4 and
22.1 kg). The carcass weight exceeded those of the other groups
significantly (68.8 kg vs. 59.3 and 63.2 kg), while there was no difference
among groups in the perirenal fat weight and red color tone (a*) of the LTL.
Groups G and P differed significantly in the LTL weight (highest in P), its
dripping loss (lowest in G), lightness (L; highest in P) and yellow color
tone (b*). In the thigh muscle, LTL and liver the highest proportion of fatty acid CLA9c11t was
reached on the G pasture, and the same trend was true for docosahexaenoic
acid (DHA , C22:6 n3) in the muscles. The n6 ∕ n3 fatty acid ratio was the
highest on the P pasture in the liver and both muscles. The liver
incorporated the highest proportion of linoleic acid (C18:2 n6) and
converted it rather effectively to arachidonic acid (C20:4 n6), coupled with
the lowest α-linolenic acid presence. In conclusion, concerning muscle mass production, group P proved to be the most
advantageous pasture; meanwhile LTL meat quality factors (dripping loss,
DHA proportion, pH, color) were more favorable on the G pasture.
Reference41 articles.
1. Allen, R. E., Luiten, L. S., and Dodson, M. V.: Effect of insulin and linoleic
acid on satellite cell differentiation, J. Anim. Sci., 60, 1571–1579, 1985.
2. AOAC: Official methods of analysis, 17th Edn., Association of Official Analytical
Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, 2000.
3. Asher, G. W., Stevens, D. R., Archer, J. A., Barrell, G. K., Scott, I. C., Ward,
J. F., and Littlejohn, R. P.: Energy and protein as nutritional drivers of
lactation and calf growth of farmed red deer, Livest. Sci., 140, 8–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.02.002, 2011.
4. Cheeke, P. R. and Dierenfeld, E. S.: Comparative animal nutrition and metabolism,
CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 2010.
5. Christie, W. W.: Lipid Metabolism in Ruminant Animals, 1st Edn., Pergamon Press,
460 pp., ISBN: 9780080237893, 1981.