Developing a monthly radiative kernel for surface albedo change from satellite climatologies of Earth's shortwave radiation budget: CACK v1.0
-
Published:2019-09-09
Issue:9
Volume:12
Page:3975-3990
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Bright Ryan M.ORCID, O'Halloran Thomas L.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Due to the potential for land-use–land-cover change (LULCC) to alter
surface albedo, there is need within the LULCC science community for simple
and transparent tools for predicting radiative forcings (ΔF) from
surface albedo changes (Δαs). To that end, the radiative
kernel technique – developed by the climate modeling community to diagnose
internal feedbacks within general circulation models (GCMs) – has been
adopted by the LULCC science community as a tool to perform offline ΔF calculations for Δαs. However, the codes and data behind
the GCM kernels are not readily transparent, and the climatologies of the
atmospheric state variables used to derive them vary widely both in time
period and duration. Observation-based kernels offer an attractive
alternative to GCM-based kernels and could be updated annually at relatively
low costs. Here, we present a radiative kernel for surface albedo change
founded on a novel, simplified parameterization of shortwave radiative
transfer driven with inputs from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy
System (CERES) Energy Balance and Filled (EBAF) products. When constructed
on a 16-year climatology (2001–2016), we find that the CERES-based albedo
change kernel – or CACK – agrees remarkably well with the mean kernel of
four GCMs (rRMSE = 14 %). When the novel parameterization underlying
CACK is applied to emulate two of the GCM kernels using their own boundary
fluxes as input, we find even greater agreement (mean rRMSE = 7.4 %),
suggesting that this simple and transparent parameterization represents a
credible candidate for a satellite-based alternative to GCM kernels. We
document and compute the various sources of uncertainty underlying CACK and
include them as part of a more extensive dataset (CACK v1.0) while providing
examples showcasing its application.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference67 articles.
1. Anav, A., Friedlingstein, P., Kidston, M., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Cox, P.,
Jones, C., Jung, M., Myneni, R., and Zhu, Z.: Evaluating the Land and Ocean
Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models,
J. Climate, 26, 6801–6843, 2013. 2. Atwood, A. R., Wu, E., Frierson, D. M. W., Battisti, D. S., and Sachs, J.
P.: Quantifying Climate Forcings and Feedbacks over the Last Millennium in
the CMIP5–PMIP3 Models, J. Climate, 29, 1161–1178, 2016. 3. Block, K. and Mauritsen, T.: Forcing and feedback in the MPI-ESM-LR coupled
model under abruptly quadrupled CO2, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 5, 676–691, 2014. 4. Block, K. and Mauritsen, T.: ECHAM6 CTRL kernel, available at: https://swiftbrowser.dkrz.de/public/dkrz_0c07783a-0bdc-4d5e-9f3b-c1b86fac060d/Radiative_kernels/ (last access: 2 September 2019), 2015. 5. Bonan, G. B., Pollard, D., and Thompson, S. L.: Effects of Boreal Forest
Vegetation on Global Climate, Nature, 359, 716–718, 1992.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|