Global Carbon Budget 2021

Author:

Friedlingstein PierreORCID,Jones Matthew W.,O'Sullivan MichaelORCID,Andrew Robbie M.ORCID,Bakker Dorothee C. E.ORCID,Hauck JudithORCID,Le Quéré CorinneORCID,Peters Glen P.ORCID,Peters WouterORCID,Pongratz JuliaORCID,Sitch Stephen,Canadell Josep G.ORCID,Ciais Philippe,Jackson Rob B.ORCID,Alin Simone R.ORCID,Anthoni PeterORCID,Bates Nicholas R.,Becker MeikeORCID,Bellouin NicolasORCID,Bopp Laurent,Chau Thi T. T.ORCID,Chevallier FrédéricORCID,Chini Louise P.ORCID,Cronin Margot,Currie Kim I.,Decharme BertrandORCID,Djeutchouang Laique,Dou XinyuORCID,Evans WileyORCID,Feely Richard A.,Feng Liang,Gasser ThomasORCID,Gilfillan Dennis,Gkritzalis Thanos,Grassi Giacomo,Gregor LukeORCID,Gruber NicolasORCID,Gürses ÖzgürORCID,Harris Ian,Houghton Richard A.ORCID,Hurtt George C.ORCID,Iida YosukeORCID,Ilyina TatianaORCID,Luijkx Ingrid T.ORCID,Jain Atul K.ORCID,Jones Steve D.ORCID,Kato EtsushiORCID,Kennedy Daniel,Klein Goldewijk KeesORCID,Knauer Jürgen,Korsbakken Jan IvarORCID,Körtzinger ArneORCID,Landschützer PeterORCID,Lauvset Siv K.ORCID,Lefèvre Nathalie,Lienert Sebastian,Liu JunjieORCID,Marland Gregg,McGuire Patrick C.ORCID,Melton Joe R.ORCID,Munro David R.ORCID,Nabel Julia E. M. S.ORCID,Nakaoka Shin-IchiroORCID,Niwa Yosuke,Ono Tsuneo,Pierrot DenisORCID,Poulter BenjaminORCID,Rehder GregorORCID,Resplandy Laure,Robertson Eddy,Rödenbeck ChristianORCID,Rosan Thais M.ORCID,Schwinger JörgORCID,Schwingshackl ClemensORCID,Séférian RolandORCID,Sutton Adrienne J.ORCID,Sweeney ColmORCID,Tanhua TosteORCID,Tans Pieter P.,Tian HanqinORCID,Tilbrook BronteORCID,Tubiello FrancescoORCID,van der Werf Guido,Vuichard Nicolas,Wada Chisato,Wanninkhof Rik,Watson AndrewORCID,Willis David,Wiltshire Andrew J.,Yuan Wenping,Yue ChaoORCID,Yue XuORCID,Zaehle SönkeORCID,Zeng Jiye

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data-products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the first time, an approach is shown to reconcile the difference in our ELUC estimate with the one from national greenhouse gases inventories, supporting the assessment of collective countries’ climate progress. For the year 2020, EFOS declined by 5.4 % relative to 2019, with fossil emissions at 9.5 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (9.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), ELUC was 0.9 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission of 10.2 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 (37.4 ± 2.9 GtCO2). Also, for 2020, GATM was 5.0 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 (2.4 ± 0.1 ppm yr−1), SOCEAN was 3.0 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1 and SLAND was 2.9 ± 1 GtC yr−1, with a BIM of −0.8 GtC yr−1. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2020 reached 412.45 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2021, suggest a rebound in EFOS relative to 2020 of +4.9 % (4.1 % to 5.7 %) globally. Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2020, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows: (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use changes emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra- tropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set (Friedlingstein et al., 2020; Friedlingstein et al., 2019; Le Quéré et al., 2018b, 2018a, 2016, 2015b, 2015a, 2014, 2013). The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2021 (Friedlingstein et al., 2021).

Funder

U.S. Department of Energy

U.S. Department of Commerce

Newton Fund

Natural Environment Research Council

National Centre for Atmospheric Science

Royal Society

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

National Research Foundation

Department of Science and Innovation, South Africa

Norges Forskningsråd

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation

Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan

Marine Institute

Helmholtz Association

GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

European Space Agency

Horizon 2020

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Tula Foundation

Fondation BNP Paribas

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

National Science Foundation

Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Cited by 71 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3