Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
-
Published:2016-02-10
Issue:3
Volume:16
Page:1479-1489
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Xia L.ORCID, Robock A.ORCID, Tilmes S.ORCID, Neely III R. R.
Abstract
Abstract. Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could impact the terrestrial carbon cycle by enhancing the carbon sink. With an 8 Tg yr−1 injection of SO2 to produce a stratospheric aerosol cloud to balance anthropogenic radiative forcing from the Representative Concentration Pathway 6.0 (RCP6.0) scenario, we conducted climate model simulations with the Community Earth System Model – the Community Atmospheric Model 4 fully coupled to tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (CAM4–chem). During the geoengineering period, as compared to RCP6.0, land-averaged downward visible (300–700 nm) diffuse radiation increased 3.2 W m−2 (11 %). The enhanced diffuse radiation combined with the cooling increased plant photosynthesis by 0.07 ± 0.02 µmol C m−2 s−1, which could contribute to an additional 3.8 ± 1.1 Gt C yr−1 global gross primary productivity without explicit nutrient limitation. This increase could potentially increase the land carbon sink. Suppressed plant and soil respiration due to the cooling would reduce natural land carbon emission and therefore further enhance the terrestrial carbon sink during the geoengineering period. This potentially beneficial impact of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering would need to be balanced by a large number of potential risks in any future decisions about the implementation of geoengineering.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference74 articles.
1. Allen Jr., L. H., Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., Jones, P. H., Valle, R. R.,
Acock, B., Rogers, H. H., and Dahlman, R. C.: Response of vegetation to
rising carbon dioxide: Photosynthesis, biomass, and seed yield of soybean,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 1, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i001p00001, 1987. 2. Angel, R.: Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft
near the inner Lagrange point (L1), P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103,
17184–17189, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608163103, 2006. 3. Bala, G., Duffy, P. B., and Taylor, K. E.: Impact of geoengineering schemes
on the global hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 7664–7669,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711648105, 2008. 4. Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N.,
Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M., A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G. B., Bondeau, A., Cescatti, A.,
Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M., Luyssaert, S., Margolis, H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O.,
Veenendaal, E., Viovy, N., Williams, C., Woodward, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial
gross carbon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate, Science, 329, 834–838, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184984, 2010. 5. Berdahl, M., Robock, A., Ji, D., Moore, J. C., Jones, A., Kravitz, B., and
Watanabe, S.: Arctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model
Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G3 and G4 scenarios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 1308–1321, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020627, 2014.
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|